Originally posted by Tubby Isaacs
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Brexit Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ad hoc View PostClearly the best outcome is that brexit gets cancelled (not postponed). Brexit is both economic suicide and poisonous racist dogshit. However, the only way I can see it being cancelled now is if the government (perhaps in some kind of cross party grand coalition style alliance) revokes it. A second referendum sounds like a really bad idea, to be honest.
Comment
-
A little bit of control taken back by Parliament - government defeated 303 to 296 on the Yvette Cooper amendment to the Finance Bill, that any further budgetary impacts of No Deal are to be voted by Parliament.
Said to be the first government defeat on a vote at this stage of a Finance Bill since 1978. The DUP supported the government but 20 Tories revelled (and conversely 3 Labour MPs).
Comment
-
At last, an article of BBC product that both illuminates, and is intellectually rigorous:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0001xs9
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walt Flanagans Dog View PostA little bit of control taken back by Parliament - government defeated 303 to 296 on the Yvette Cooper amendment to the Finance Bill, that any further budgetary impacts of No Deal are to be voted by Parliament.
Said to be the first government defeat on a vote at this stage of a Finance Bill since 1978. The DUP supported the government but 20 Tories revelled (and conversely 3 Labour MPs).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tubby Isaacs View PostCan't they just repeal this vote in the event of No Deal? I don't get it at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walt Flanagans Dog View Post
As far as I can tell its impact in practice is that the government can't amend taxes to cover the cost of No Deal, it could still use Treasury Reserves or direct departments to use existing funding. But it's obviously a clear marker for future votes and unusual in itself that there was that scale of rebellion on a Finance Bill issue.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tubby Isaacs View Post
You can do an extra finance bill, surely? I think we had an extra "emergency budget" in 2010. Osborne was talking about a post Brexit "punishment budget" too.
The issue of the Grieve amendment mentioned above is about to cause a big row, starting around 1pm.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ginger Yellow View PostSeriously? That's pretty pathetic. There's no good reason she shouldn't do it immediately. After all she already delayed the vote.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walt Flanagans Dog View Post
They can do it at any time, but it would still need to be voted on. They can use Reserves without a specific vote so that would be the quickest way of funding No Deal preparations.
The issue of the Grieve amendment mentioned above is about to cause a big row, starting around 1pm.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tubby Isaacs View Post
I don't see why she'd lose a vote, that's the thing. It would be like passing a finance bill, wouldn't it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walt Flanagans Dog View Post
I don't think I'm saying anything different - it's a bit of symbolism and in practice it would get blown away in the chaos of No Deal becoming a reality, but it's still something that would have to be specifically overturned in Parliament and not just a given. When I referred to 'future votes' I meant the upcoming ones on Brexit generally, not specifically on if that issue came back.
Some positive news - Gardiner has "clarified" his stuff the other day was a personal view. So hopefully the leader will drop talk of renegotiating too. We might be getting somewhere.
Comment
-
It'll get lost in the business motion row, but:
Tory MP apologises for Paddy Ashdown 'from the grave' remark Lib Dem MP Layla Moran says that when she paid tribute to former Lib Dem leader Paddy Ashdown, the MP for North West Leicester "shouted 'from the grave'".
And back to the action - the business motion row is heating up. There may not be many kicks left in the can after all.
Comment
-
I mean, if a majority of MPs want to do that they can, in principle, whether it's in the statute book or not. All this does is reinforce the EU 27's belief that the UK government is not to be trusted to stick to its deals, and hence the backstop is necessary. Very, very stupid, tactically.
Comment
Comment