We know that Bardet can descend, so there's going to be a lot of hoping he doesn't recover tomorrow and trying to get rid of him before the top of the Joux Plane. Otherwise Quintana can forget second.
I suspect Yates will settle for trying to defend the white jersey tomorrow and seeing where he ultimately ends up on GC.
I see that Purito and Meintjes are both on the same time and separated by the hundredths of a second from the time trials. Seventh place is definitely worth racing for in terms of prestige, money and ranking points so I expect Purito to man mark all the way round the Champs and both to finish high up on the stage.
I wonder if Cav is second guessing his decision to leave early, with EBH finishing up in fourth?
Apart from a descent by Bardet and a 30 second attack by Mollema, Froome seemed in total control. If Froome has the same form next year what could the other teams do differently?
I too had each way money on Bardet (£1), but perhaps more satisfying was watching Louis Meintjes Zubeldiaing his way to the top ten at 11-2.
Sky certainly seem to have got the whole teamwork thing honed to perfection. The standard of the guys they are able to get pulling for the leader is something else - they would be leaders of half of the other WT teams. But, even that aside, Froome himself looked pretty much the strongest guy there overall, and Bardet pleasingly probably the closest to him. Not much to choose between Porte, Quintana, Aru, Yates and others - some good days, some bad days, but none had the mix of consistency and, to give the winner his dues, the killer instinct to get the time gaps needed. But, as we thought at the start, it was the ITTs wot won it.
Betting wise, Bardet's double return of podium and best French rider along with a couple of Cavendish wins means I end up a couple of pounds to the good on my initial tenner. I came close on a couple of stages but missed out - the worst being a failure to take Oliveira each way instead of for the win on the first ITT.
Whether this simply becomes an Olympics or Vuelta kitty, time will tell.
Froome now moves into a rarefied group - winners of more than two Tours de France:
And since I'm in a statsy kind of mood, I decided to list the manufacturer of the bike that won each stage on this year's race (for some reason I did this in reverse order).
Something of the Euros about that Tour, I suppose. It's not going to be remembered as an all time exciting one, but there were some memorable moments and stages.
I can't help wondering what difference it would have made in the mountain tussles if Contador had been there too. I don't think he would have won, but suspect he would have spiced things up, caused counter attacks from rivals, and that could have pressurised Sky more.
I had got to the feeling the Froome was one of those boring, mechanical Tour winners. Plods around in the pack, has a strong team that negates attacks, and wins time in the time trials. But this year, Bardet apart he was also probably the most attacking of the lead riders. Porte tried a couple of times, as did Valverde. You wouldn't expect Yates to try. But it wasn't much. And Quintana's lack of attacks was a big let down.
Froome, meanwhile, actually went for it on a handful of occasions, and would probably have finished further ahead if his attack with Porte and Mollema wasn't ruined by the motorbike crash.
Comment