The Jonathan Pie ref jolted me. He's a Spiked wank and those fuckers are irredeemable. Especially the wank I went to school with (who seemed to stop being a spokesperson on media/social media (not sexy enuf for sky newspaper review slots??) for the genocide denying fake trots in 2009, though he's still an Institute of Ideas contrarian wank).
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
My centrist mates
Collapse
X
-
I think that Medium piece has some interesting points - another issue he doesn't mention is that topical shows have a balance requirement. So if the Government does something appalling that week and you want to talk about it, you get told to slate the opposition elsewhere in the programme, regardless of whether they've done anything interesting in the last seven days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lucy Waterman View PostI think that Medium piece has some interesting points - another issue he doesn't mention is that topical shows have a balance requirement. So if the Government does something appalling that week and you want to talk about it, you get told to slate the opposition elsewhere in the programme, regardless of whether they've done anything interesting in the last seven days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Amor de Cosmos View PostI think Pie's OK, especially his recent extended bits, possibly because Spike means nothing at all to me.
They became Living Marxism in the 90s and rapidly lurched towards right-libertarianism, defending on libertarian grounds, among other things, the possession and distribution of images of child sexual abuse. It then got sued out of existence for claiming ITN fabricated evidence of genocide in the Balkans (they were Milosevic fans).
They reformed as Sp!ked, an online magazine funded by the Koch Foundation - a hard-right libertarian contrarian magazine which combines with support for fascist street movements, nominally feminist transphobic groups, and opposition to literally any anti-racist initiative, the EU (ex-RCP Claire Fox became a Brexit Party MEP), the environmental movement, and any corporate regulation at all.
Jonathan Pie's writer is a guy called Andrew Doyle - whose other "comic" creation is Titiana McGrath - a parody of """woke"""" activist culture that manages to miss a fairly rich seam of material to mine for humour in favour of constantly being misogynist, transphobic and racist.
The only genuinely funny joke in Doyle's output is the meta one, that the same person is making money off Pie (who gears his appeal to exasperated remainers) and McGrath (which is geared to st george's cross emoji, brexit and trump twitter).Last edited by Bizarre Löw Triangle; 04-03-2020, 10:33.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lucy Waterman View PostI think that Medium piece has some interesting points - another issue he doesn't mention is that topical shows have a balance requirement. So if the Government does something appalling that week and you want to talk about it, you get told to slate the opposition elsewhere in the programme, regardless of whether they've done anything interesting in the last seven days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flynnie View PostI used to date a fairly close family member to Moore, and it was pretty illuminating as to how highly paid columnists get their takes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MsD View Post
Yes, and that would kind of be OK if they weren't so soft on the absolute bastards. Of course I'm biased, but closing hospitals and deporting lifelong Brits is not of the same haha value as, say, Jeremy Corbyn walking through a door marked EXIT. Anyone can make jokes about Trump's hair. A satirist needs to sting.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Making films does take time, especially the fundraising. If he's having authored TV projects turned down by UK broadcasters, it's news to me. Though it may be a situation where he might do one if someone was bothered to ask, I guess.
Comment
-
Originally posted by That Night In Barcelona View Post
Would you be able to expand on this? My guess is most columnists get their takes from their Twitter feed these days.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
The thing is – writing from if not quite the belly of the beat, its fingernails – is that in, say, my game, the people who write opinion-ey columns about stuff are also people whose jobs involving reporting, observing, talking to people. You may or may not like Barney Ronay or Miguel Delaney or Matthew Syed or Jonathan Liew or David Conn, but their opinion pieces are based on what they do in their day jobs - covering actual events. Yer professional columnist - yer Moores or Nick Cohens or Liddles or Hartley-Brewers - simply fart out whatever prejudice they feel like airing that day, and have license to do since their corner of the trade requires nowhere near the disciplines required in other parts of it. They're all massively past their sell-by date too.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I have most of them blocked. I’ve found many of them to be misogynist as well as generally horrible. I’m sure they’d deny that to themselves as well as everyone else but they added an extra layer of sneer for me even when I’ve been very polite, as I try to be on friends’ pages.
Still no remorse, nor recognition of the part they played in our election loss, and in the long-term damage to the Party.
Comment
-
I was going to dredge this thread up because somehow I've got subscribed to a newsletter called "The Sensible Centrist" which arrived by email a couple of days ago with articles like "Ending the Civil War on Race and Culture" and "Ending the War between Progressives and Conservatives" and "Black Lives Matter Protest was Irresponsible and Unfair".
From the titles I genuinely thought it was a satire created by someone on here. Then I noticed it was all Australia themed, which makes that unlikely. Which means it must be serious. Which altogether more terrifying.
Comment
Comment