FWIW, here's the Verge's reporting on the subject, which cites internal correspondence as well as unnamed employees.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostLike him being held to perform a contract to which he agreed voluntarily?
But US wide you are seeing leveraged buyouts not using as much leverage and massive amounts of goodwill being accumulated in bank deals.
Comment
-
Well, while that is certainly true, the banks were the ones climbing over each other to fund a fundamentally uneconomic deal, including buy doing absolutely nothing with regard to possibly spreading their risk.
What would have been funny is if they had insisted he perform on the syndication cooperation covenant only for him to turn around and say "Business Plan? You all knew I didn't have one."
Comment
-
Rarely is there a social product as polarizing as twitter is, and now the Chief Twit is finding even he isn't in touch with an idea that people will pay to create the content as a verified account. Plus the greater than 5% bots certainly won't pay up.
The only sensible move is to cut the R&D people as they are all clearly pretty awful, but then you need R&D for any chance of it working out.
Comment
-
Count me another person mystified that people don't curate their timeline to improve their experience.
I mean, I know you can go browsing, and sometimes I do, and it doesn't take long to find hate. But I rarely see it in my timeline.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snake Plissken View PostMusk was probably joking, but he's absolutely terrible at what we humans call "humour".
The chances that the site becomes an Elon fanboy circle jerk are increasing at pace. Truth Social with better tech and a different cult leader.Last edited by ursus arctos; 02-11-2022, 12:38.
Comment
-
This is such an obvious massive disaster. Cyclothemia can be a real problem when there are no restraints on your behaviour.
I am slightly amused that people are now getting upset about twitter being owned by a tech billionaire with dubious political views, a business model worryingly reliant on allowing all sorts of dubious political traffic for volume, and the worrying role of saudi arabia and qatar in the ownership. This was also largely true a month ago. There have been so many problems with this site since the beginning.
Comment
-
Tee hee.
https://twitter.com/isaiah_bb/status/1587818353837629443
Poor ol' Muskrat just wants people to like him, and it's not going to happen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View Post
- Likes 1
Comment
-
The World Cup is increasingly running on nostalgia and nationalism, isn't it?
It built it's prestige and brand at a time when there wasn't even much domestic football on TV in most countries, so it was a chance to see players and styles that one would otherwise never see. But now anybody can watch pretty much any match from anywhere and the best players from around the world are concentrated in a pretty small group of mostly European clubs.
There are a lot of fans - in other sports too - that insist that international sports "should" be the highest level of the game and that the rest of the sport should accommodate that, but I am increasingly of the view that that's just not true.
For one, it's objectively not the highest quality football. Maybe it used to be. But it isn't any more. Diluting the finals field with more teams is only making it less so.
And I've come to see that there's no good reason to just assume that fans or players should care more about their national team than their local one or even one that's local to somewhere else. It's all just rooting for laundry. It's just one of those assumptions that people trot out based on nothing more than circular logic or, worse, rank nationalism and there is no guarantee that younger people will feel the same way about national teams.
Comment
Comment