True enough. Though the original Cascadian vision offers a means of resolving them, or at that's the intent/theory/hope at any rate
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The country you personally most respect
Collapse
X
-
I don't see a way that the US could break up, peacefully or otherwise, and I'm not sure it could happen in Canada, though it might be easier there. I feel like the world would be better overall if that happened in the US, but some places would get a lot better and others would probably get a lot worse.
Unless I'm forgetting something, we haven't even had states split since the Virginia/West Virginia split in the Civil War and there are lots of quixotic efforts to do that - Long Island, parts of California, East Colorado. Some people in Killington, VT want it to be part of NH even though it's not on the border.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostAmor, does the original Cascadian vision even include the parts on the other side of the mountains? There are already movements in Eastern Washington and Oregon seeking to secede from the coastal regions
The proposed country or region largely would consist of the Canadian province of British Columbia and the US States of Washington and Oregon. Including all parts of the bioregion, Cascadia would stretch from coastal Alaska in the north into Northern California in the south, and inland to include parts of Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, and Yukon. More conservative advocates propose borders that include the land west of the crest of Cascade Range, and the western side of British Columbia.
Most Cascadians, however, stand behind the bioregional definition.
Comment
-
That broad a footprint would of course make it exponentially more difficult, but I'm sure that they realise that.
HP is right in noting that these ideas have been around for yonks without ever coming close to fruition, but it is also true that there are relatively small polities that are increasingly the political opposite of the states in which they find themselves. At the same time, the political balance of power is such that the emergence of new entities can be seen as an existential threat by one side, as the advocates of statehood for DC and Puerto Rico have found out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostThat broad a footprint would of course make it exponentially more difficult, but I'm sure that they realise that.
HP is right in noting that these ideas have been around for yonks without ever coming close to fruition, but it is also true that there are relatively small polities that are increasingly the political opposite of the states in which they find themselves. At the same time, the political balance of power is such that the emergence of new entities can be seen as an existential threat by one side, as the advocates of statehood for DC and Puerto Rico have found out.
They are considered part of the US for purposes of the MLB draft, but separate for the purposes of international baseball competition. That seems to illustrate how they're treated by the US at large - they're part of the US when its convenient for big business and not when it's not.
Comment
-
One problem for Cascadia is that it would include the already separatist "State of Jefferson", which is basically an excuse for the racist redneck desendents of loggers and believers in environmental destruction to escape the libtards in Portland and Sacramento. Creating a liberal, left-coast nation that includes Jefferson would not please the Klamath Falls brigade and you'll have an armed insurrection from the get-go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostThat broad a footprint would of course make it exponentially more difficult, but I'm sure that they realise that.
HP is right in noting that these ideas have been around for yonks without ever coming close to fruition, but it is also true that there are relatively small polities that are increasingly the political opposite of the states in which they find themselves. At the same time, the political balance of power is such that the emergence of new entities can be seen as an existential threat by one side.
A research study by the Western Standard in 2005 found that support for exploring secession from Canada was at 35.7% in British Columbia, and 42% in Alberta.[35] While difficult to gauge support specifically in Washington and Oregon, because no research has been done for those states, a nationwide poll by Zogby International in 2017 found that 39% of Americans support a state's or region's right to peacefully secede from the United States, the highest rate since the American Civil War.[36] However, none of these studies are specifically about forming an independent Cascadia. The movement saw much discussion in the 1990s,[27] and while the increase in security and American nationalism after the September 11 attacks set back the movement's momentum for some time, the concept has continued to become more ingrained into society and the public consciousness.[27] In January 2011, Time magazine included Cascadia number eight on a list of "Top 10 Aspiring Nations", noting it "has little chance of ever becoming a reality"
I don't think there's a cat in hell's chance of it happening in my lifetime, or for several years beyond. It is a very appealing idea though and worth sustaining for that reason alone, particularly in times like these.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostHard to say given the fact that much of the cannabis business is still underground, but I would guess that lumber, fishing and "standard" agriculture may be higher. Cannabis is primarily a coastal range crop and more established in California than Oregon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sporting View PostCzech Republic and Slovakia for managing a peaceful divorce.
Actually, it would be remiss not to put a word in for Slovakia. Two years ago, the country saw hundreds of thousands of people on its streets protesting about the murder of a journalist. Some estimates say the numbers were actually greater than in 1989. The prime-minister, interior minister and chief of police all quit their posts.
Now, an 'anti-corruption coalition' is in government and the country should be included - but isn't always - on the list of those whose handling of Covid-19 has been particularly successful.
No guarantee that things won't turn crap again, and the government hasn't had time to start reforming the instittions yet. Still, at this exact moment, it's not a bad country to be in at all.
Comment
Comment