Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone for an astronomy thread?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Yup. There's more detail on the link.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sits
    replied
    Is that a closeup of the sun?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    I'm a bit surprised that no-one posted a link to this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-53429054


    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Originally posted by hobbes View Post
    I’d love to get out and see Neowise but it’s been continually fucking cloudy for weeks.
    Friday night is looking possible.

    When would it be visible?

    Leave a comment:


  • Incandenza
    replied
    Thinking of driving out away from the city to try to see it tomorrow night as well. It's been clear, just hard to see it around me with how low it is on the horizon, and all of the light.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobbes
    replied
    I’d love to get out and see Neowise but it’s been continually fucking cloudy for weeks.
    Friday night is looking possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guy Profumo
    replied
    Turns out the moon is a mere stripling at 85 million years younger than thought:


    https://www.space.com/moon-85-millio...​​

    Leave a comment:


  • ursus arctos
    replied
    https://twitter.com/matthewbailyes/status/1282422182476492804

    Leave a comment:


  • The Awesome Berbaslug!!!
    replied
    AAAAAARGH The fallen Angel is on the other side of the hill, and he's going to be so fucking pissed off.

    Leave a comment:


  • ursus arctos
    replied
    Imagine seeing this

    https://twitter.com/mizuho73700856/status/1281166848164151296

    Leave a comment:


  • The Awesome Berbaslug!!!
    replied
    You can see why comets freaked the fuck out of everyone. That's amazing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guy Profumo
    replied
    Superb!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    What a terrific photo.

    Leave a comment:


  • ursus arctos
    replied
    https://twitter.com/Ely_Cathedral/status/1281960747803828226

    Leave a comment:


  • Guy Profumo
    replied
    Any excitement for this comet then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sits
    replied
    Venus was really bright when something woke me at 4:50 this morning.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobbes
    replied
    No worries. I just love conjunction for some reason.
    Years ago there was a conjunction that lasted for months between Jupiter and Venus and for 3 or 4 days a month the moon too. I'd see it as I crossed the millennium bridge on the walk home. That was spectacular.

    Leave a comment:


  • Evariste Euler Gauss
    replied
    Thanks hobbes, I was wondering what that bright thing above the moon was when I was out and about just now. I didn't notice Saturn, but I didn't look particularly carefully.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobbes
    replied
    If you look due south tonight, you'll see a full moon. Just above it, the very bright star is Jupiter. If you imagine a point halfway between the two then look about 3 moon diameters to the left, that's Saturn.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rogin the Armchair fan
    replied
    I think Gliese (number) is a generic name given to about 1000 stars close to us but not visible to the naked eye (and so not named by pre-telescope astronomers).

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    That's a very confusing subhead until you read a long way down the article. What's DNA doing on expolanets and how did they recover it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Diable Rouge
    replied
    https://twitter.com/ScienceSpinning/status/1276519666282901504

    Not the first time exoplanets have been discovered orbiting Gliese.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snake Plissken
    replied
    I was referring to Falcon doing launches for $60m and it previously costing $400m. With each launch developing the capability to do this, where the rivals can't even get off the ground.

    SLS is costing $2bn a year and delivering nothing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rogin the Armchair fan
    replied
    Originally posted by Snake Plissken View Post
    They’ve also reduced the cost of launches by 80%.
    So the Two something billion dollars Space X got for this and three more launches was 80% less than the Russians had been getting? No wonder Putin can afford to treat Trump to all those, ahem, "hostesses".

    Leave a comment:


  • Diable Rouge
    replied
    NASA is, but not SpaceX.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X