Originally posted by Diable Rouge
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Breaking News - PM Calls for General Election
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Duncan Gardner View PostJust in case Terri (or a Tory successor) has a brainstorm and calls another election this year, here's a summary of majorities in their 318 seats:
0- 5%: 40
5- 10%: 27
10- 15%: 26
15- 20%: 31
20- 25%: 39
25- 30%: 42
30- 35%: 44
35- 40%: 37
40- 45%: 21
45- 50%: 11
Labour probably didn't know many of those small majorities were even in play. 2 of those in Wales alone (Aberconwy, Preseli Pembs).
A separate issue, but a few seats could have slipped away because of Labour's "Jewish problem".
http://www.danielallington.net/2017/...-antisemitism/
These are certainly within range, and with more time for appropriate legwork, might easily be won.
Comment
-
What's wrong with the boundary changes and reduction in number of MPs? I can see why people aren't keen as it would reduce the number of Labour MPs but as far as I see it.
Still independent mapping body.
And it aims to give each constituency the same number of voters.
Oh. And while I'm here. What would it take to get a proportional method of running general elections in the UK?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lucy Waterman View PostThe public actually like FPTP.
I've read a few pro PR things recently which state that one of the things people like about FPTP is that it delivers strong majorities. Is that really true?
Comment
-
Aaaaand out come the Blairites to fuck things up for Corbyn again. Regular as clockwork.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...P=share_btn_tw
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lucy Waterman View PostThe public actually like FPTP.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snake Plissken View PostAaaaand out come the Blairites to fuck things up for Corbyn again. Regular as clockwork.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...P=share_btn_tw
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snake Plissken View PostAaaaand out come the Blairites to fuck things up for Corbyn again. Regular as clockwork.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...P=share_btn_tw
I think Corbyn's shifting the right way, but I'm keeping my eye on McDonnell, Milne etc.
Comment
-
We ended up with UKIP assembly members in Wales thanks to PR. A party nowhere near actually winning a seat directly got a few protest votes and now we have slimy Neil Hamilton sucking down a salary in a country he won't deign to live in.
Not that great an advert for PR that.
Comment
-
It was a very good short term electoral ploy, but if it becomes fixed policy Labour will probably lose half their new vote. They can't shift just now but, but if there's an election in October I fear the McDonnell argument will win again, and it will be very hard to back down then (esp as they will most likely be the govt).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View PostWe ended up with UKIP assembly members in Wales thanks to PR. A party nowhere near actually winning a seat directly got a few protest votes and now we have slimy Neil Hamilton sucking down a salary in a country he won't deign to live in.
Not that great an advert for PR that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diable Rouge View PostBut surely, as with the BNP winning MEPs, they'll be promptly turfed out in 2020, anyway?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Levin View PostOh, I completely believe that. Which was why i was wondering what would have have to happen for that to change.
I've read a few pro PR things recently which state that one of the things people like about FPTP is that it delivers strong majorities. Is that really true?
Comment
-
STV can be pish as well to be honest. The 5th choice in 1st round of ballot wanker sneaking through with cunning transfer management, the wankers' roar of "YOU BETRAYED THE MANIFESTO!!" Still as loud as in FTTP idiot joy showland, even though coalition has been the norm for almost 100 years outside of intense periods of FF recklessness/trickle down corruption. I'd see AV+ working for Westminster. More proportional than the AV pish that Clegg tried to get through, less confusingly different for the auld yins than STV, or as awful as the Israeli List with no proper threshold system. If the Sweaties can get it, I'd say E&W (NI already having PR, but at least fairly consistent a system, unlike Scotland's AV+ for Holyrood, STV cooncil - which anecdotally no one really understands up there- stramash) can too.Last edited by Lang Spoon; 21-06-2017, 00:26.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Etienne View PostLots of people voted UKIP. It was a fucking disgrace to democracy they only got one MP in 2015. Just because they are a bunch of morons doesn't mean we should keep in place our hopelessly unfit electoral system in order to fuck them over.
I don't see it as a disgrace to democracy. It depends how you define representation. Your MP represents your constituency whether you voted for them or not. You can still ask them to raise issues on your behalf.
Comment
-
You can still ask them to raise issues on your behalf.
Good luck with that if said issue doesn't fit with them and their party's preoccupations.
A friend of mine had the idea of standing for parliament as an independent who would promise to put every HoC vote to a referendum of his constituents. There are obvious logistical problems, but I'm still slightly surprised that no-one has done anything resembling this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snake Plissken View PostUKIP support AV. For obvious reasons.
Comment
Comment