Richard Seymour before todays events
Ian Dunt's analysis
Whilst Laura Kuennsberg in an extraordinary contribution
"If you're not into Brexit politics this is going to sound completely mad but... May might agree today that N Ireland can basically be like Norway (high alignment model) before the cabinet has decided if the rest of the country is going to be Norway or Canada (low alignment)
3. Johnson/Gove want a looser arrangement (Canada), others want closer ties (Hammond/Rudd) - crucial thing is the cabinet hasn't yet had full discussion, let alone a decision
4. So if May (either today or next week) gives headsup that NI is going to be Norway, how can rest of UK be anything but?
5. Altho, this we are a long, long, way from a final deal and the words that oil the wheels for progress at this stage, are words, not reality - here ends mad, niche thread
That she calls basic factual analysis of the underlying issues "mad" and "niche" indicate what the real problems of Breixt have been.
I suspect, then, that the DUP would be happy to collapse both the government, and the Good Friday Agreement. The coalition is an alliance of convenience: the DUP are not Tories in today's sense. They may hate Corbyn, but they hate a border in the Irish sea even more. Meanwhile, the Agreement is based on communal power-sharing, when the DUP and Sinn Fein cannot agree on such points as: recognition of the Irish language, marriage equality, the Bill of Rights, legacy inquests and so on.
I don't think the DUP can give in on this and remain the same party. Even if Foster wanted to cut a deal behind some arse-saving casuistry, any attempt to do so would create a new schism.
Which means that either May has to accept that the coalition is falling apart, and call a new election; or she has to brazenly dare her own MPs and cabinet colleagues to collapse the government and force a new election. Right now, we're waiting to see which she has actually chosen.
I don't think the DUP can give in on this and remain the same party. Even if Foster wanted to cut a deal behind some arse-saving casuistry, any attempt to do so would create a new schism.
Which means that either May has to accept that the coalition is falling apart, and call a new election; or she has to brazenly dare her own MPs and cabinet colleagues to collapse the government and force a new election. Right now, we're waiting to see which she has actually chosen.
May has three choices, all of which break her. If she insists on a border in Ireland, the talks break down and she is finished. If she insists on a border in the Irish sea, the DUP pull the plug on her parliamentary deal and she is finished. If she accepts regulatory alignment for the whole of the UK, the Cabinet hawks revolt and she is finished. Whatever happens, it's hard to see how she survives.
"If you're not into Brexit politics this is going to sound completely mad but... May might agree today that N Ireland can basically be like Norway (high alignment model) before the cabinet has decided if the rest of the country is going to be Norway or Canada (low alignment)
3. Johnson/Gove want a looser arrangement (Canada), others want closer ties (Hammond/Rudd) - crucial thing is the cabinet hasn't yet had full discussion, let alone a decision
4. So if May (either today or next week) gives headsup that NI is going to be Norway, how can rest of UK be anything but?
5. Altho, this we are a long, long, way from a final deal and the words that oil the wheels for progress at this stage, are words, not reality - here ends mad, niche thread
That she calls basic factual analysis of the underlying issues "mad" and "niche" indicate what the real problems of Breixt have been.
Comment