Hmm. Odd there was a three year overlap for vehicles that were very much the same sizewise
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Old cars that now look tremendous.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Amor de Cosmos View PostHmm. Odd there was a three year overlap for vehicles that were very much the same sizewise
Apparently the Gremlin was intended to be a 'small car', while the Pacer was designed from the 'passengers out', as a car that's roomy like a big car...but with small exterior dimensions. It was designed to be an urban car, vs the big-ass suburban land yachts that were the style at the time.
Amazingly (as an aside), the smallest engine you could get was a 3.8 litre inline 6. Jeebus. That's an engine you'd have found in enormous Buicks, Pontiacs and Chryslers.
Comment
-
Even at this remove, it's hard to get past the 'what were they thinking?' styling weirdness. I mean, you could coerce yourself into the idea that it's an endearing oddness...like a French car or something. But it's really just quite gangly in so many ways. Surely the market responded to that at the time. The Gremlin...I think you could go 'yeah, it's weird...but oddly interesting'.
Comment
-
Back in 70s England, any American car made us stop and look, if only out of curiosity. But I still remember walking through the prosaic surroundings of Station Approach, Maidenhead and seeing a metallic blue Pacer parked. I have to say that next to the Escorts, Allegros and Hillman Avengers it looked bloody futuristic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WOM View PostAmazingly (as an aside), the smallest engine you could get was a 3.8 litre inline 6. Jeebus. That's an engine you'd have found in enormous Buicks, Pontiacs and Chryslers.
I looked it up. Pacer 3.8l inline 6 in 1979, 100hp for 3,000lb weight.
1976 Ford Escort Mk II 1.6, 84hp for 2,100lb weight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WOM View Post
Just so we don't sound like ignoramuses, should the topic of the Pacer arise at a dinner party, I've done some reading.
Apparently the Gremlin was intended to be a 'small car', while the Pacer was designed from the 'passengers out', as a car that's roomy like a big car...but with small exterior dimensions. It was designed to be an urban car, vs the big-ass suburban land yachts that were the style at the time.
Amazingly (as an aside), the smallest engine you could get was a 3.8 litre inline 6. Jeebus. That's an engine you'd have found in enormous Buicks, Pontiacs and Chryslers.
Ooh I missed snake's similar postLast edited by The Awesome Berbaslug!!!; 26-01-2024, 19:32.
Comment
-
I was wondering how these power outputs compared to other cars of the time. I worked for Saab UK in the early 80s and I remember quite a hoo-haa when they launched the 900 T16S because it delivered 175bhp. That got me wondering about the company cars my Dad drove in the late 60s and early 70s. These were invariably Austin 1100s. I’ve looked those up and it appears their A Series engines* were packing a mighty 40-45bhp. There was much excitement when he arrived one day in his new Morris 1300GT complete with vinyl roof and special wheels. 65bhp.
*The BMC A Series engine is a story in itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMC_A-series_engine
Comment
-
I just learned about this one last week. Behold the Ford Carousel - designed to be a 'garageable family van' and developed at Ford by Lee Iaccoca and product planning director Hal Sperlich. It reached the rolling-concept stage of development before being killed off in favour of Ford's profitable full-size family station wagons.
Fast forward a few years when Iaccoca and Sperlich decamped Ford for Chrysler. One of Iaccoca's best early ideas was to revive the 'garageable van' into the minivan, which was a massive hit for Chrysler and helped save the company. 40 years on, they're still building them.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Felicity, I guess so View PostThat's a 1954 Georgian (USSR) car that sits outside a garage in Moniaive, Dumfries and Galloway
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Awesome Berbaslug!!! View Post
I'm not sure why exactly this looks so good, but it really does. I like the proportions
Comment
Comment