I've never been quite sure why so many of our religion set-tos on here concern the left-footed crowd. I don't know how OTF's other "fundamentalist atheists" (to borrow the term Seumas Milne was so conspicuously pleased with himself for using in the paper the other day) feel about it, but the Catholics are really not at the top of my silliness list at all.
I do find the whole thing baffling: stuff like taking a loony notion such as transubstantiation and throwing a huge grave-faced intellectual effort at trying to reconcile it with an otherwise non-loony view of the world. I mean, why would you want to bother? But compared with, for example, Calvinist predestination, or Bible Belt creationism, it's pretty small beer, irrationality-wise.
So what I'm saying is, let's all have a go at the whey-faced Prods as well. There. Aren't I nice?
I do find the whole thing baffling: stuff like taking a loony notion such as transubstantiation and throwing a huge grave-faced intellectual effort at trying to reconcile it with an otherwise non-loony view of the world. I mean, why would you want to bother? But compared with, for example, Calvinist predestination, or Bible Belt creationism, it's pretty small beer, irrationality-wise.
So what I'm saying is, let's all have a go at the whey-faced Prods as well. There. Aren't I nice?
Comment