Why don't they make warm but normal trousers? It seems you can have really thin normal trousers, ski trousers, or hiking trousers with warm lining but waterproofed material on the outside. Why the fuck can't I have normal trousers with a warm lining?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The problem with trousers
Collapse
X
-
Guest
-
The problem with trousers
Flannel lining, pah. I want fake fur lining, dammit. And yeah, there is the thermal underwear option, but why not just have it in one piece of clothing?
Anyway, stop being such a wuss! It's -9°C over here.
Comment
-
The problem with trousers
Ginger Yellow wrote:
Flannel lining, pah. I want fake fur lining, dammit. And yeah, there is the thermal underwear option, but why not just have it in one piece of clothing?
Anyway, stop being such a wuss! It's -9°C over here.
Comment
-
The problem with trousers
I'm just annoyed that, thanks to the aforementioned niece situation, I'm getting the cold without the snow. And, no, it's not particularly cold. I'm just curious as to why there are hundreds of winter coats etc for sale in every shop, but basically no winter trousers.
('Everydaywear'? Yeah, it's one word.)
Comment
-
- Mar 2008
- 14186
- The Deep South of England
- JPS Lotus
- Shortcake ...no, Custard Cream! ...no, Jammie Dodger...
The problem with trousers
It's a good point really, GY.
I routinely buy M&S trousers for work and they were a whole lot more flimsy this than last. Almost translucent, in fact!
However, what with riding, I've become addicted to thermals. I can thoroughly recommend the M&S standard ones if you go that route. They're much better than the ones millets charge the same (or more) for. The good thing about thermals is that you can move *that* thermal lining from trousers to trousers. I reckon that, if they made what you're talking about, they'd charge more than trousers and thermals sold separately - considerably more.
Changing topic slightly...
A similar situation occurs with waterproof (i.e. plastic) motorcycle trousers. (And no, I can't afford expensive textile or leather options!) A couple of years back, I bought what were ostensibly the last pair of waterproof overtrousers with a quilted lining. They're brilliant - I rode to Sheffield in them, last December, and didn't get cold. Now it seems that the only truly waterproof trousers that are affordable are either lined with a flimsy material or not lined at all, meaning your sweat would wick straight back into your clothes, leading to chilling and smelliness too.
Comment
-
The problem with trousers
Because thick, padded trousers as everydaywear would look silly.
Comment
-
- Mar 2008
- 29953
- An oasis in the middle of Somerset
- Bath City FC; Porthcawl RFC;Wales in most things.
- Fig roll - deal with it.
The problem with trousers
Surely there are two reasons for this
Firstly, any such fur-lined trousers would be too warm once you went indoors
Secondly, layers are warmer as they trap air
Comment
-
Guest
The problem with trousers
You could make some? You can borrow my mum's sewing machine if you want.
Comment
-
Guest
The problem with trousers
I missed the niece situation. What happened? Hope everything's all right?
Comment
-
The problem with trousers
I can recommend the Heatech stuff from Uniqlo, does the trick very well, quite cheap and looks good if you are skinny. Full range from socks to tops via longjohns. Tested in "civilian" situations and up the hills.
Comment
-
The problem with trousers
Aren't trousers missing from that list, though?
Long Johns have probably saved me from hypothermia in various rented rooms in Brixton. But no-one - no-one - will ever look at you the same once they've seen you sporting them. They look like a cross between a nappy and a bandage, but by god you feel the benefit.
Alternatively, you could just buy some trousers made of wool.
Comment
-
Guest
The problem with trousers
Aww. Well, welcome to Charlotte.
Wool is not good necessarily because it can be scratchy &/or irritating to the skin. (And one might not wish to wear wool if one were a crazed vegan idealist.) But I suppose that also then comes back to linings. Which probably really is a question of expense.
Comment
Comment