Perhaps slightly, Kev, though the solution is (I think) clear enough.
[spoiler] I love the 'sandwiches' device; ok with you if I nick that? The word 'in' does double duty, I'd say; it's not quite kosher to have 'in sandwiches' to mean IN.....IN. [/spoiler]
Cheers IT, I know what you mean about the two jobs. I kept thinking that it ought to be 'in in sandwiches' but couldn't bring myself to write that it course. If you can make a neater job with "sandwiches", please feel free!
...but enough of such frippery Why has no-one yet solved what i thought was a ridiculously easy clue- have I made a mistake ?< stretches muscle I haven't used for a while>
Not The Da Vinci Code author Dan Brown novel, but a cheaper generic version.
...but enough of such frippery Why has no-one yet solved what i thought was a ridiculously easy clue- have I made a mistake ?< stretches muscle I haven't used for a while>
Not The Da Vinci Code author Dan Brown novel, but a cheaper generic version.
(3,5)
Ain't it always so?
We come up with what we think are gimmes to either move the game along, or we're smug about the wordplay thinking wussens clever, yet much head-scatching ensues.
Comment