Nah, it was already ruined. I saw The Lobster and it was shit.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lobster Boy (was: This Jordan Peterson Guy)
Collapse
X
-
https://mobile.twitter.com/DawnHFost...47477011910657
The lobster just can’t help it. “The Jewish Question” again, now with mathematical proofs! This philo Semitic bullshit is only a half step from anti semitism. See also Burchill, Paul “Bonkers” Johnson.
Comment
-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=4LqZdkkBDas
This is very good. It’s quite delicious imagining the average neckbeard, or indeed creepazoid prime JP himself getting schooled by a transgender philosophy geek.
Comment
-
How much of a fascist do you have to be to be less liberal than Pakistan?
Nasty oppressive Islamic country still more progressive than JP on trans people's rights.
Comment
-
Transgender folk have been a longstanding part of the culture, with quasi religious roles in funerals or at saints shrines, more tolerated in Muslim parts of South Asia than by Hindus apparently. At least when Sufism was the dominant influence.Last edited by Lang Spoon; 09-05-2018, 19:43.
Comment
-
Sufism has been under attack in Pakistan for some time - bombings at shrines and festivals - and Hijras less tolerated. They've become increasingly marginalised, especially as more conservative forms of Islam have become prevalent in part owing to the massive Saudi funding of medrassas.
Any issue on which the PML-N is more tolerant than a Canadian university professor is worthy of note.
Comment
-
Sadly this piece in the NYT is behind a paywall, because I'd genuinely like to read it https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/s...-for-life.html
The one quote I have seen (about those fucking Incel fuckers and the killer in Toronto) is stunningly awful enough
“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Mr. Peterson says of the Toronto killer. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”
Mr. Peterson does not pause when he says this. Enforced monogamy is, to him, simply a rational solution. Otherwise women will all only go for the most high-status men, he explains, and that couldn’t make either gender happy in the end.
“Half the men fail,” he says, meaning that they don’t procreate. “And no one cares about the men who fail.”
I laugh, because it is absurd.
“You’re laughing about them,” he says, giving me a disappointed look. “That’s because you’re female.”
But aside from interventions that would redistribute sex, Mr. Peterson is staunchly against what he calls “equality of outcomes,” or efforts to equalize society. He usually calls them pathological or evil.'
Comment
-
Originally posted by ad hoc View PostSadly this piece in the NYT is behind a paywall, because I'd genuinely like to read it https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/s...-for-life.html
The one quote I have seen (about those fucking Incel fuckers and the killer in Toronto) is stunningly awful enough
Comment
-
Does this link to the Bowles piece work for others?
It is quite long, and the photographs really convey what a massive twunt the guy is.Last edited by ursus arctos; 19-05-2018, 12:31.
Comment
-
- Apr 2011
- 2053
- A bottom-bottom wata-wata in Lake Titicaca
- Atlético Machu Picchu, Lake Titicaca Pan flutes FC
- Buñuelos Arequipeños
Originally posted by ad hoc View PostSadly this piece in the NYT is behind a paywall, because I'd genuinely like to read it https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/s...-for-life.html
The one quote I have seen (about those fucking Incel fuckers and the killer in Toronto) is stunningly awful enough
Some of these cunts may not even really think what they say half of the time but it’s a nice little earner and they get to lash out at "the Establishment/Elite" and get plenty of social media likes for it, they like to delude themselves into thinking that they are the standard bearers for sections of society or whole generations so why hold back, huh?
Which it is what I explained here and here using the French situation as an illustration given that French society has nurtured and churned out Peterson-ish characters for the past two decades, those French new reactionaries are a little different to Peterson obviously (more European, more obsessed with identity etc.) but it's very much a "same shit, different shovel" case here.
They often start reasonably low-key and then get increasingly outrageous as the media goad them and as their bank balances grow. The relationship between them and the media is very symbiotic. It’s akin to a vicious circle really: cunts get addicted to money and fame and feckless inflammatory statements, and the media can’t get enough of them so they prod them. Rinse and repeat indefinitely.
Comment
Comment