http://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/dec/09/media-groups-challenge-ban-naming-woman-right-to-die-sparkle?CMP=share_btn_tw
So. Can any of the otf-room lawyers explain to me why anyone would possibly think there's a public interest issue here in identifying her, or, more accurately, her still living relatives?
Lawyers for the Daily Mail, the Times, the Daily Telegraph and the Independent argue that any ban on identifying the woman after death is a significant interference with the right to freedom of expression and that evidence of potential harm to family members is “very thin”.
Comment