Senna, then
I agree that any blanket attempt to ban naturalised players is almost certain to result in a very quick tumble down a very slippery slope.
At the same time, I understand where Hieronymous is coming from with his criticism of the Roger situation, which can only be described as farcical.
That leads me to advocate a position in which naturalised citizens who have not played at senior level for their home country are fully able to represent their new country, but no "fast track" naturalisation procedures are allowed solely on the basis of athletic prowess.
Which is pretty much exactly what erwin said.
As an aside to whoever mentioned the Serie A passport scandal, that had nothing whatsoever to do with national team qualifications and everything to do with limitations on the number of non-EU players allowed in any Serie A squad. Those restrictions are obviously a very worthy subject of discussion, but I don't think that it is useful to conflate the two.
I agree that any blanket attempt to ban naturalised players is almost certain to result in a very quick tumble down a very slippery slope.
At the same time, I understand where Hieronymous is coming from with his criticism of the Roger situation, which can only be described as farcical.
That leads me to advocate a position in which naturalised citizens who have not played at senior level for their home country are fully able to represent their new country, but no "fast track" naturalisation procedures are allowed solely on the basis of athletic prowess.
Which is pretty much exactly what erwin said.
As an aside to whoever mentioned the Serie A passport scandal, that had nothing whatsoever to do with national team qualifications and everything to do with limitations on the number of non-EU players allowed in any Serie A squad. Those restrictions are obviously a very worthy subject of discussion, but I don't think that it is useful to conflate the two.
Comment