I once wrote something similar to that on this forum and was told that I was "trying too hard to be cool".
You were told right.
I think what I orginally said at the time wasn't "The Beatles aren't very good at what they do", but something like, "I really don't care for The Beatles' stuff. It's little more than nursery rhymes set to music".
Which is probably trying too hard as well, but I stand by it. And I wear a battered leather jacket, so I'm dead cool anyway. I am, aren't I? Please say I am.
The Beatles's tunes are no more or less 'nursery rhymes set to music' than any other great pop. However, it's probably reasonable to suggest that they had more than a hand in both creating and perfecting the form. Just as they did rock, psychedelia, etc etc...
But not liking The Beatles AND Cash? I'd say here's an argument for Legion to be cast into the swine.
My tastes in general are pretty poor. Without wishing to derail the thread, I also dislike champagne and caviar (Lordy!) and I'm not all that fond of Lionel Messi.
treibeis, we won't know how cool you are until you post a video of yourself doing the Tango.
At a class a few weeks back, one woman did actually get some camera thing out and, rather foolishly, started filming what was going on. The Lady I'm Walking Out With very nearly did to her what freshly-convicted footballers sometimes do to over-enthusiastic paparazzi on courtroom steps.
I'm about as dynamic on the dancefloor as I am when I'm leaning against the wall in the gents after sinking too many Holsten Edels on a Friday night.
I really don't care for The Beatles' stuff. It's little more than nursery rhymes set to music.
A Jazz-loving guitar-and-bass-playing friend of mine once claimed that the music of The Beatles was trivial, and boasted that he could recreate any song within a day. He folded after I proposed Tomorrow Never Knows.
I know disagreeing with most of this stuff is the whole idea, and everything, and I duly do disagree with most of it. But the keyboards thing is the winner.
Comment