Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #26
    Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

    Point of fact. I'm about 99% sure that at the end of Raiders, that warehouse is labeled "Somewhere in Washington, DC." So this is a different warehouse, but the ark is there now.
    That bit's okay with me - WW2 had happened in the meantime, it's entirely plausible the US moved all its important stuff from Washington DC (which would have been a target for bombing raids had the war ever reached the eastern US seaboard) to somewhere in the middle of the Nevada desert.

    The UK did exactly the same with its (paper) records of births, marriages and deaths, which were moved lock stock and barrel from Somerset House (on the Thames) to a depot in Southport in Lancashire.

    Somerset House never got a scratch in the blitz, whereas one of the few buildings destroyed in Southport was ... you can guess the rest.

    Comment


      #27
      Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

      Still doesn't adequately explain how, once the 13th skull is returned, the "interdimensional beings" manage to come back to life,
      That's just how they're built. The skulls were always alive. Just sort of dormant. Waiting until they could all reconnect with each other.

      destroy the entire city of El Dorado and piss off back to where they came from
      That was just collateral damage from creating their big vortex portal thingy.

      - why didn't they just crush the Conquistadors like ants in the first place instead of allowing them to nick one of their heads?
      They weren't interested in crushing anyone. They're scientists. The details of how the Spaniards managed to decapitate one of them isn't explained, but it doesn't really need explanation. The aliens are powerful, but not invincible. After all, one of them crashed in New Mexico.

      Comment


        #28
        Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

        It's pretty terrible. Easily the worst movie Spielberg has directed since 1941.

        There are some entertaining sequences, absolutely, but this is also the first time I can remember actually nodding off in a cinema. The crystal skull is both too purely a McGuffin (so there is no urgency or tension to the revelatory final sequence - contrast with the Grail which was needed to save Dr. Jones and the incorrect replicas of which killed spectacularly, or with the obvious power of the Ark of the Covenant), and too over-exposed to be any good as a McGuffin. It totally fucks the movie - and that destruction has George Lucas' grubby fingerprints all over it.

        The only explanation for it that I can see is that Spielberg was too embarassed to tell George what a crock of shit he had dreamed up, so he just did the best he could.

        It is definitely intermittently entertaining, but spectacle divorced from character and story just becomes boring very quickly.

        Comment


          #29
          Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

          Mark Felt wrote:
          Easily the worst movie Spielberg has directed since 1941.
          Crikey, nearly seventy years...

          Comment


            #30
            Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

            Easily the worst movie Spielberg has directed since 1941.
            Hardly. AI, War of the Worlds, The Terminal and The Lost World: Jurassic Park were all worse than this.

            I agree that the plot is too muddled with extra characters and the skull was too over-exposed. I agree that Lucas (who merely cowrote this) isn't a great writer.

            What, exactly, is George Lucas good for? The recent Star Wars films, especially in contrast to the early ones that he didn't direct, show he's not a very good director.

            The recent Star Wars films, as well as the latest Indiana Jones film, suggest he's not really a great writer.

            He's good at distilling some good ideas from old movie serials and pulp novels and he's good at hiring some very good CGI people, artists, character designers and so forth. And he's good at merchandising. So basically he's a brilliant producer and studio exec who thinks he's a writer-director.

            Comment


              #31
              Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

              Yeah, I get the impression that Lucas came up with a brilliant "concept" for the original Star Wars film, and Hollywood being Hollywood they've indulged him ever since, with generally disastrous results.

              It would be like J.K. Rowling demanding to direct the Harry Potter movies.

              Comment


                #32
                Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                I saw this over the weekend and more or less enjoyed myself, though the enjoyment was based almost entirely on the earned goodwill I have for Indy as the movie itself was pretty terrible for many of the reasons listed above, but also because:

                * The Tarzan-like scene was embarrassing and, may have even been so in the animated Disney film in which it belonged.

                * To amplify Mark Felt's good points about the crystal skull as MacGuffin, the other problem was that it made no sense as part of Indy's character arc. The Ark, the stones and the grail all tied together with what Indy was going through/learning about himself in the movies, and so MacGuffins were themselves resonant. Here they served no purpose but to look like a larger-than-scale version of something you'd get out of a coin-machine in a biker bar.

                * Leaving aside the portions of the plot that seemed to be introduced for no real reason and then dropped, the main plot felt like something out of the post-Franklin W. Dixon-era Hardy Boys. . . very much a poorly thought out, badly written thin reed to hang a movie on. Plus, they somehow managed to put together a Indy-has-a-son story completely without emotional resonance. I would have thought that would be hard to do.
                The only explanation for it that I can see is that Spielberg was too embarassed to tell George what a crock of shit he had dreamed up, so he just did the best he could.
                The whole aliens/crystal skull thing reminded me very much of a story Kevin Smith (Clerks, Dogma, etc.) tells about writing a Superman script in the late '90s. The producer, Joel Silver, kept telling him that the script was good, but what it needed to be great was a big, mechanical spider. Eventually, this became one of the reasons Superman didn't get remade until two years ago, and it's also why the Will Smith movie Wild, Wild West had a huge mechanical spider in it. Apparently, Lucas had a stick up his ass about there being aliens in the Indy movies since the beginning, and Spielberg had managed to back him down until, unfortunately now.

                Comment


                  #33
                  Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                  and Hollywood being Hollywood they've indulged him ever since, with generally disastrous results.
                  I don't know if anyone is indulging him, at least not willingly. He made so much fucking money off of Star Wars and all the related tat that he was able to create and maintain Lucasfilm, ILM and Skywalker Sound. He's essentially the biggest budget independent filmmaker in history.

                  20th Century Fox distributes his stuff because it's going to make money no matter how bad it is, but they don't have much influence on how it gets made.

                  Marvel seems to be following this model. They've set up their own studio. Universal or whomever distributes it but they have more or less total control over their superhero films. I think that will usually result in better films, but not always. Marvel has a lot of confidence in its "properities," in the case of Spider-man and Iron Man that's good, because the film benefits by sticking to the source material instead of letting Hollywood ruin it with their committee-think. On the other hand, some of Marvel's properties don't deserve to see the light of day.

                  Comment


                    #34
                    Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                    Marvel seems to be following this model.
                    I believe this was also the Pixar model, before Disney acquired it last year. To tie this together with the thread, Pixar became a stand-alone production house after Steve Jobs bought it from George Lucas.

                    As for the film, one thing I did find to be amusing/clever, was that Indy's son called himself the dog-themed name "Mutt" rather than his given name, Henry (just like Indy called himself Indiana, after his dog, rather than Henry).

                    Comment


                      #35
                      Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                      My 7 year old loved it!

                      Comment


                        #36
                        Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                        I thought it was quite enjoyable, not exactly brilliant but not "Dude, where's my Car".

                        The story may not be believable but what's believable about a cup that grants everlasting life or a golden box that kills Nazis?

                        As Indy's supposed to be an homage to B movies to me it seems to do what it says on the tin. Besides it cost me £6.40 to watch it (and I wasn't even in London town) so I tried to get my money's worth.

                        Comment


                          #37
                          Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                          I liked it.

                          It suffered from the same problems as attack of the clones - way too much hype.

                          Did anybody else feel cheated by the fact that this Indana movie wasn't two movies in one? The opening scenes of the past three indiana movies conclude a story- this one didn't. i was pissed off.

                          Comment


                            #38
                            Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                            I watched and realised that I have seen the first one about 13 times, the second probably 6 and the third none and none of the them at the cinema

                            I went with a birthday party of 8 8-year-olds at to the cinema. I enjoyed but agree that the ending was bit unfocussed but, you know, it's not Sixth Sense.

                            Obviously the Ray Winstone character was pretty rubbish but, there again, it's Ray Winstone, what do you expect, he has been doing a Michael Caine for forever and he hasn't even done a reasonable job of playing Ray Winstone since, I don't know, Sexy Beast? Births Marriages Deaths?

                            I also quite fancied Cate Blanchett in it, which I have never done before

                            I think it could have dropped the four swear words in it which were pointless.

                            Other than that it was OK but not classic.

                            Mind you, I went to a TGI Fridays after and enjoyed it so my critical faculties are obviously shot to fuck

                            Comment


                              #39
                              Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                              Bored Of The Dance wrote:

                              I also quite fancied Cate Blanchett in it, which I have never done before
                              Four words; 'Notes on a Scandal'.

                              Comment


                                #40
                                Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                                Another four. I haven't seen it.

                                Comment


                                  #41
                                  Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                                  It met my expectations. Which, since they were incredibly low, means it is pretty awful.

                                  I echo the sentiments above. If they were waiting for this script, they should have kept waiting.

                                  Comment


                                    #42
                                    Dr. Jones, Dr. Jones, calling Dr. Jones . . .

                                    "I thought it was quite enjoyable, not exactly brilliant but not "Dude, where's my Car". "

                                    Hey! Dude, Where's My Car is at least "quite enjoyable". It has no right to be, but it is.

                                    Comment

                                    Working...
                                    X