Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WaPo WTF

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    WaPo WTF

    Washington Post business side offers up access to WaPo reporters and Obama administration officials to lobbyists, for a fee.

    For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post has offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to "those powerful few": Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and — at first — even the paper’s own reporters and editors.

    The astonishing offer was detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the lobbyist said he felt it was a conflict for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial staff."

    With the newsroom in an uproar after POLITICO reported the solicitation, Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli said this morning that he was "appalled" by the plan and said the newsroom will not participate.

    "It suggests that access to Washington Post journalists was available for purchase," Brauchli told The Post’s media reporter, Howard Kurtz. The proposal "promises we would suspend our usual skeptical questioning because it appears to offer, in exchange for sponsorships, the good name of The Washington Post."

    Earlier this morning, Brauchili said in a staffwide e-mail that the newsroom would not participate in the first of the planned events — a dinner scheduled July 21 at the home of Publisher and Chief Executive Officer Katharine Weymouth. Brauchli,was named on the flier as one of the "Hosts and Discussion Leaders."

    The offer — which essentially turns a news organization into a facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters — was a new sign of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival.

    And it's a turn of the times that a lobbyist is scolding The Washington Post for its ethical practices.

    "Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate," says the one-page flier. "Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth. ... Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders."

    Kris Coratti, communications director of Washington Post Media, a division of The Washington Post Company, said: "The flier circulated this morning came out of a business division for conferences and events, and the newsroom was unaware of such communication. It went out before it was properly vetted, and this draft does not represent what the company’s vision for these dinners are, which is meant to be an independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers.

    "As written, the newsroom could not participate in an event like this. We do believe there is an opportunity to have a conferences and events business, and that The Post should be leading these conversations in Washington, big or small, while maintaining journalistic integrity. The newsroom will participate where appropriate."
    [...]
    The flier says: “Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No. The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it. What is guaranteed is a collegial evening, with Obama administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds typically on the guest list of 20 or less. …

    “Offered at $25,000 per sponsor, per Salon. Maximum of two sponsors per Salon. Underwriters’ CEO or Executive Director participates in the discussion. Underwriters appreciatively acknowledged in printed invitations and at the dinner. Annual series sponsorship of 11 Salons offered at $250,000 … Hosts and Discussion Leaders ... Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post ... An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done. ... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m. ...

    #2
    WaPo WTF

    They've now cancelled it, correctly. But... Jesus.

    It takes some doing when a lobbyist makes an ethical complaint against a newspaper.

    Comment


      #3
      WaPo WTF

      That's the sort of polical/economic matchmaking one doesn't normally, you know, put down on paper.

      Of course, it's getting the 'product of a rogue element within the organization' treatment. Someone low-level will be losing their job shortly.

      Comment


        #4
        WaPo WTF

        It certainly gives a new meaning to the idea of the press being gatekeepers.

        Comment


          #5
          WaPo WTF

          Let me guess.

          The people who did the LA Times Staples Center supplement have moved on to the WaPo?

          Comment


            #6
            WaPo WTF

            This makes that look like Pulitzer-worthy material in comparison, ursus.

            WOM, that's what I was thinking. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that "salons" like that take place, but I am surprised how open they were about whoring out their reporters.

            Comment


              #7
              WaPo WTF

              Exactly, Inca.

              In other 'strange bedfellows' news, it seems that one of the SEC bigwigs that was tipped off about Bernie Madoff in 2003 was married to Bernie's niece. Odd about the tip not being followed-up on.

              Comment


                #8
                WaPo WTF

                To be honest, I can entirely believe this is something that the marketing guys dreamed up without asking or informing the editorial people. Sales people are always stepping over the boundaries of the the sales/editorial divide. The question is why the management didn't vet this before it was sent out, or if they did, why on earth they thought it was OK.

                Comment


                  #9
                  WaPo WTF

                  WOM, that's a bit over-egged.

                  It wasn't a "tip"; it was a lawyer looking at the operation who raised a series of questions about Bernie's cover story that she was never authorised to follow up on. The guy in question was senior to the lawyer who raised the questions, but not really a "bigwig" and he didn't marry the niece until three years later (it isn't even clear that he knew her at the relevant time). Full story here.

                  GY, it takes some chutzpah to list the Executive Editor on the invite without anyone on the editorial side being informed. Then again, if there is one thing that marketing types aren't short of, it's chutzpah.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    WaPo WTF

                    What GY says makese sense. In my experience, the marketing people often have no idea what the journalists actually do nor do they grasp the ethical issues. It's not that they're unethical, per se, it's just that these kinds of issues never occur to them.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      WaPo WTF

                      GY, it takes some chutzpah to list the Executive Editor on the invite without anyone on the editorial side being informed. Then again, if there is one thing that marketing types aren't short of, it's chutzpah.
                      Well, exactly. Our marketing/ads people have certainly touted things editorial would never agree to.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        WaPo WTF

                        Ah, you're right ursus.

                        "Swanson married Shana Madoff in 2007. The SEC has said he worked on reviews related to Madoff in 1999 and 2004 but he never did while he was involved with his future wife. SEC officials are not permitted to work on matters that involve people with whom they're romantically linked."

                        That's more detail than the article I read contained.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X