One person, one vote?
But how would you find criteria, and questions, that didn't implicitly or explicitly discriminate against one group or another.
And I presume people who "failed" the test and were thus denied the right to electoral representation would have a pretty decent case for refusing to pay taxes. After all, civic life would now be nothing to do with them, guv. And why should people who are good at passing tests but might not actually DO anything - in terms of their own civic or political engagement - be privileged above those who aren't good at passing them but might actually be involved in stuff?
As I said, an idea without any merit whatsoever.
But how would you find criteria, and questions, that didn't implicitly or explicitly discriminate against one group or another.
And I presume people who "failed" the test and were thus denied the right to electoral representation would have a pretty decent case for refusing to pay taxes. After all, civic life would now be nothing to do with them, guv. And why should people who are good at passing tests but might not actually DO anything - in terms of their own civic or political engagement - be privileged above those who aren't good at passing them but might actually be involved in stuff?
As I said, an idea without any merit whatsoever.
Comment