Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amusing insolvency filings of our time

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WOM
    replied
    These are consistently great. But do you have to go through these are part of your job or something, or is it purely a hobby?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    CR-2019-004544 EXPLOSION FREE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
    You'd think that would go without saying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    These guys, on the other hand, are just minding their own, legitimate, business:
    CR-2019-BRS-000105 Legitimate Industries limited Companies - Application - Notice of Intention to appoint an administrator

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    CR-2018-004711 ALBATROSS SAILING LIMITED & MASTER WORKBOAT LIMITED
    That's just asking for trouble, surely.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    The Maxwell brothers' hearings are on Monday, if anybody wants to pop along to the Rolls Building. Alas, I'll be in Spain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Cogito
    replied
    About the length of time it felt like I'd been reading that fucker for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Jarndyce v Jarndyce.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    CL-2001-000289 & CL-2001-000290 A v B
    No idea what this is, but holy fuck it's been going on for 18 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sits
    replied
    Good spot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    BR-2019-000506 Maxwell Kevin Francis Herbert Bankruptcy - Petition - Creditors
    BR-2019-000507 Ian Robert Charles Maxwell Bankruptcy - Petition - Creditors

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    Cambridge Analytica judgment tomorrow

    Leave a comment:


  • ursus arctos
    replied
    Betting has been suspended on the application having referred to "striking midnight"

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    Friday 5 April 2019

    At 10:30 AM

    Application Hearing

    IP-2018-000191 Glass Slipper Limited v Dunn and another
    If counsel doesn't use "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit", I'll be disappointed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    Companies Applications

    CR-2018-006683 In the matter of Cambridge Analytica (UK) Limited

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    It's all about the Benjamins:

    Hearing Room 5

    Before DEPUTY MASTER BARTLETT (Sitting on Behalf MASTER TEVERSON)

    Wednesday 16 January 2019
    At 10:30 AM


    Application Hearing

    PT-2018-000691 Benjamin v Benjamin

    Leave a comment:


  • ursus arctos
    replied
    He didn’t appear, but his lawyers withdrew his claim for immunity

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    African diplomat Boris Becker is back in court on Monday.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    An appealing butt:

    A2/2017/3116 Butt -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department. Application of Claimant for permission to appeal with appeal to follow if granted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    BL-2018-000988 Spilt Milk Management Limited v Amy
    I told her it was no use, but she wouldn't listen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    CR-2018-007910 GOBBLEDEGOOK COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED Companies - Petition - Winding Up Petition
    In hindsight, maybe not the best name.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    BR-2018-001170 Jason Atherton
    Hope this isn't the chef. I quite like his restaurants, though it does seem a few have closed in recent months, so maybe it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    That Prick v Prick case turned out a cracker. Sample evidence:
    Meanwhile, back on Facebook, Mr Martinez responded to Ms Leon's 11 August message on 9 September 2016 by telling her to "FUCK OFF", with added expletives.

    ...

    the name PRICK has, for me, always been associated with Henry

    ...
    Lola R says in her review that she has had half a tattoo applied at the Tattoo Parlour and intends to go back for the other half. She does also appear to have been sufficiently deceived by the use of the name "PRICK" on the Cactus Shop website to leave a 5 star review of her tattoo application there. I am at a loss to understand how Lola R can believe that the Cactus Shop website has any connection with the Tattoo Parlour, given that she appears just to have come from the Tattoo Parlour and so must be well aware of the dissimilarities in style and get up of the place, compared to the website she is on. For that reason I feel that she must fall into the category of "moron in a hurry" who has been deceived but who cannot sustain a claim for passing off.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    Also, one with some football relevance:
    BR-2018-000528 Paul Baxendale-Walker

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Yellow
    replied
    Less a court case, and more a description of a process:

    HC-2017-002624 Insurance Medical Reporting Limited and another v Your Lawyers Limited

    Leave a comment:


  • ursus arctos
    replied
    That’s just awesome.

    I’ve already suggested that my colleagues use it their training materials.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X