Gardiner is my least favourite posh Weegie this side of Kuenssberg.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Brexit Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by George C. View PostBazza Gardiner says Seven months minimum for a People's Vote, hence their GE call.
If that's right, it's not happening this year, if ever.
corbyn is playing a dangerous game here with his membership, this is basically the only real issue where he is badly out of step with them.
Comment
-
-
One upside of tonight is that I read up on "The Campbell Case", over which Ramsay McDonald's government took such a kicking in 1924.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_Case
It qualifies as quite interesting rather than very interesting. He only ended up getting 6 months prison.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nefertiti2 View Post
bastani's right, though isn't he?
Nup, Corbyn is warmed over social democracy slightly to the left of Merkel in a wider European context. If he was as transformative as fuckin Wilson let alone Clem I'd be happy, he's milquetoast dressed up as Full on Left. (And of course Attlee had an empire to bleed to pay for Socialism, outside the EU even the timidity of Corbyn's programme is undoable).
Comment
-
I'm also starting two pages back every time i go to the Brexit thread. (But only the Brexit thread) I always end up at TonTon's long post re Labour Conf and have to next three pages. I'm willing to blame Safari but, cos fuck Apple and their dirty Brit MD.Last edited by Lang Spoon; 16-01-2019, 00:47.
Comment
-
I'm currently starting at this post each time. I suspect a 2039 bug armed with a time machine.
Comment
-
Looking back over how this thread went yesterday evening I would say it took less than 90 minutes for the heaviest defeat for 95 years for the government to turn into a "let's pile in on Labour" fest. I shouldn't be surprised since I suspect that 427 of the 479 pages of it are of that nature, but it is still irritating (he understates). Like Tonton says, let's just enjoy this defeat for at least a little while.
Our pet gammon on his return is going to be sorely disappointed about his inability to wind people up, since if he's not discussing the minutiae of opposition policy he's not really part of the zeitgeist.
Comment
-
Cos it’s Labour that are going to decide this, since there seemingly can’t be a parliamentary majority for anything halfway sane without them.
This is the most powerful they’ve been since the Libya vote.Last edited by Lucy Waterman; 16-01-2019, 06:53.
Comment
-
No it's still May that decides. The consensus seems to be that if she wants parliamentary approval for anything she has to soften her line. But she regards softening her line as going against all her xenophobic instincts, so she'll never do it. She'd rather a ruinous catastrophic no deal than to do anything that goes vaguely against her xenophobia. She truly is an appalling person. It's possible that Labour could somehow force a second referendum with the support of the non-insane wing of the Tory party, but it will be really difficult given how stuff works.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flynnie View Post
So in other words, the members got hoodwinked?
corbyn is playing a dangerous game here with his membership, this is basically the only real issue where he is badly out of step with them.
Corbyn wasn't playing the membership, the Sensibles are. They are waving their own unicorn in front of the public.
Comment
-
Nah, article 50 could be extended or revoked for a second vote. The deadline is only an issue as long as the PM is unwilling to ask for it. So, either the Tory sensibles or DUP decide to change PM via a VONC, May decides that she'd prefer an extension to no deal, or those who voted against her deal change their mind with some fudge.
Comment
-
I know that is the reality but the PV don’t mention that- nor that it is in the PMs power to grant a second referendum. It gets in way of the main aim.
Speaking of which, how long after the VONC fails do we see the first “Corbyn shouldn’t have called it” article from someone who was telling him to call it three weeks ago?
Comment
-
I only agree with Jonathan Freedland about 50% of the time, but this falls within that 50% https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...eat-may-errors
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nefertiti2 View Post
bastani's right, though isn't he?
The Tories can't get rid of May, May doesn't think she'll be in a better position if she calls an election and the Tories plus DUP have a parliamentary majority.
The ERG lot aren't going to prefer Corbyn's brexit to No Deal so they, having exhausted their other options - having failed to remove May - are content to wind down the clock.
The Continuity Remain Tories are also unlikely to prefer Corbyn's brexit deal to May's. They presumably want an Article 50 extension or a second referendum, and neither of those are going to happen with a Corbyn majority - which would see them lose their seats to the bargain. So they're left running down the clock in the hope that the parliamentary arithmetic switches in favour of a second referendum.
The only faction I could see that might support a labour leader other than Corbyn is the DUP - but even so I think they're in a similar position to the ERG.
Comment
Comment