Brexit Means: Leaving Single Market, Customs Union European Court of Justice
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Indeed. And with the spending plans.
I'd pipe down on "government in waiting" talk. Wonderful result, but didn't quite do it, so Tories need to get on with the job and eat their shit sandwich.
Nah, it's alright to be saying that. Keeps the symbolic pressure up. As long as nobody notices the fingers crossed that bluff is ever called.
Brexit Means: Leaving Single Market, Customs Union European Court of Justice
But arithmetic shows that Labour are talking rubbish. It's not even a hypothetical.
I can't vouch for the Tories even having a survival instinct at the moment, but I'd guess that they've got somebody who can knock heads together and say "Do you fucking want Corbyn in?"
Brexit Means: Leaving Single Market, Customs Union European Court of Justice
Since when have facts mattered in stuff like this? It's about perception. And the perception is that May is a loser who should stand aside. Which she will probably do soon enough, but to be replaced by Johnson or Rudd or someone. All of whom have less legitimacy than Corbyn, in our current quasi-presidential era.
Keeping that front and centre is useful, even if the Commons maths do mean it can't realistically happen this side of another election.
In fact, that it isn't feasible is actually helpful. It means the bluff is a safe one to make.
If only he [Boycott] could have sorted that judge as well. ''The frustration! For nine hours and 10 minutes it drove me crackers. I couldn't understand 80 per cent of it. It was all in bloody French. I'm waiting there wondering what the hell they were saying and it's my life! I knew chuff all what was happening. Then the interpreter would turn to me and ask me something and I'd forgotten what the hell I was talking about. You can't put across to people the difficulty, the stupidity of it.
''It was medieval, it was archaic, it was such a farce.'' It is difficult in mere words to conjure Boycott's incandescent ire. His eyes flashed behind their blue contact lenses, his hands described loops of irrepressible angst and every syllable was boomed in stentorian Yorkshire. For a minute, you feel compelled to agree with him that for the French to conduct their business in French is a preposterous disgrace.
If only he [Boycott] could have sorted that judge as well. ''The frustration! For nine hours and 10 minutes it drove me crackers. I couldn't understand 80 per cent of it. It was all in bloody French. I'm waiting there wondering what the hell they were saying and it's my life! I knew chuff all what was happening. Then the interpreter would turn to me and ask me something and I'd forgotten what the hell I was talking about. You can't put across to people the difficulty, the stupidity of it.
''It was medieval, it was archaic, it was such a farce.'' It is difficult in mere words to conjure Boycott's incandescent ire. His eyes flashed behind their blue contact lenses, his hands described loops of irrepressible angst and every syllable was boomed in stentorian Yorkshire. For a minute, you feel compelled to agree with him that for the French to conduct their business in French is a preposterous disgrace.
Ha hadn't seen this. There's a very good biography of Boycott by (of all people) Leo McKinstry. The last chapter on the trial is a bit silly (guess what it says?) though clearly Boycott didn't help himself by not turning up the first time, and making it into a circus with "Geoff's Girls" the second time.
God bless us all. Our best hopes are monoglot Peter O'Hanrahanrahan civil servant/ think tank wonk types, mostly, led by a Tory wet who looks disturbingly like the dodgy geezer no one talks about from the first series of The Thick of It/funny Muppets. Their lot have decades of accumulated knowledge about trade negotiations lost to teh Brits since forever. It's going to be ugly, Scotland v India pitifully one sided ugly in some Tubbs inscrutable cricketesque analogy.
Speaking ahead of a meeting with other EU leaders in Brussels on Friday, Mr Hammond said: "We've set out very clearly our desired outcome in the Prime Minister's Lancaster House speech and in the Article 50 letter that we've sent.
"But it is a negotiation, and as we go into that negotiation my clear view. and I believe the view of the majority of people in Britain, is that we should prioritise protecting jobs, protecting economic growth and protecting prosperity as we enter those negotiations and take them forward."
Hammond was back on message today about leaving the Single Market and Customs Union. But on the whole I'm more hopeful, and Labour talked about non-tariff barriers today. Much better.
This is good. From the Mail on Sunday of all places, so will save you having to link.
It is important we accept substantial numbers of foreign students without pretending they are immigrants. Theresa May’s inner circle seems to think otherwise. They wish to clamp down – yet that would be preposterous. Anyone who sits down with India knows that, within ten minutes, their officials will raise the restrictions already in place for Indian immigrants, many of whom wish to study here.
The idea that we can have rigid controls on foreign students and then win great trade deals is so out of touch it is embarrassing.
Finally, I would point to the sheer risk involved in putting ourselves outside of the EU. It is enormous.
We’ve already seen incomes squeezed because of the weak pound, which, in turn, is clearly due to the self-imposed risks of our national stance on Brexit.
Our so-called ‘golden relationship’ with China is fraying. And as for talk of trade deals with New Zealand, I am speechless. It is a country smaller than Greece.
I've never understood why foreign students on temporary visas are included in the immigration figures, apparently only 5% stay on at the end of their studies.
But modern trade isn't about tariffs. You can have tariff-free trade agreements and still be unable to offer goods or services in that market. This isn't the 1870s.
But modern trade isn't about tariffs. You can have tariff-free trade agreements and still be unable to offer goods or services in that market. This isn't the 1870s.
Yeah, that was the elephant in the room all along. Hopefully it'll get attention now. One of the best expositions of the non-tariff problems came from, of all people, Richard North, explaining what could happen to agricultural products.
I've never understood why foreign students on temporary visas are included in the immigration figures, apparently only 5% stay on at the end of their studies.
The really political figure is net migration, so if students come then leave, they don't show as net migration across time. Maybe that's it. Certainly some politicians have pressed for distinguishing students, but have the ONS?
Comment