Originally posted by The Awesome Berbaslug!!!
View Post
Well, that's Remainer nonsense designed to split the Leave vote and transparently so.
In reality, there are three possible referendum question sets:
1. Do you agree with the result of the 2016 referendum and believe that the UK should leave the EU?
Do you disagree with the result of the 2016 referendum and believe that the UK should remain in the EU?
In other words, a horrible-sounding please "reconsider the earlier democratic decision" vote.
2i The UK should leave the EU?
The UK should remain in the EU?
In the event that the vote is to leave there is a second referendum:
2ii The UK should leave with ND?
The UK should leave with the current WA?
The UK should renegotiate the current WA?
In other words, a binary choice followed by a series of options if the first re-vote reconfirms the 2016 result. Probably way too complicated for the UK electorate.
3. The UK should leave with ND?
The UK should leave with the current WA?
The UK should renegotiate the current WA?
In other words, the result of the 2016 result is respected and the nature of the terms of the departure are decided upon. See above re. complexity.
(Obviously the wording of 1 and 2i could be the that of the other one.)
Comment