The victims of the mainland bombings will always be brought out, and indeed should never be forgotten, but it's important to also remember other victims of the Troubles, including the families who didn't get justice because the Establishment were busy stitching up the wrong people, and knew it, but didn't care. Paddy Hill of the Birmingham Six is friendly with some of the relatives of the bombings, they recognise their common experience. They all had their lives shattered that day.
The Catholic victims, the non-sectarians, the totally innocent, all were brushed aside for political reasons.
There's greater awareness of that in the general community now; that nothing in the Troubles was clear-cut, that information was manipulated for propagandist reasons, and perhaps the greatest, most cynical evil was not that of the Paramilitaries. Not to suggest that they're all heroes, there were some right thugs and gangsters in their ranks.
But the point is, people know it's not as black and white as it was presented back in the day.
I picture a British politician on the news years ago being Unionist, albeit not always comfortable with Unionists. They wouldn't see Northern Ireland as being occupied, for instance.
Tubby Isaacs wrote: That's not really what I mean.
I picture a British politician on the news years ago being Unionist, albeit not always comfortable with Unionists. They wouldn't see Northern Ireland as being occupied, for instance.
I wasn't posting in response to you, but generally :-)
JC's stand against the evil forces of rugby has banished any doubts that I may have had about him. Ideally he'll stay true to his grass roots activist past and come and tour the pubs of west London cutting the aerial cords of every television showing the thing. It might take some time but he's one for the long haul.
Do you think the commentators will blame him personally for any empty seats rather than the corporate hospitality sector?
Surely the one note hysterics of the anti-Corb knocking copy will have a neutering effect when its authors eventually have to try and drum up outrage about things that actually matter?
That's obviously DISGUSTING, but if it enables him to cover more ground rooting out publically televised rugby, then it is the type of compromise that a leader should be prepared to make.
But to be serious for a second, the faux enthusiasm in Ireland for rugby is purely down to class aspirations, as the linear evolution from GAA to soccer to union shows. The native game derived its support from communitarian egalitarianism, the spread of soccer nationwide remained largely a working-class phenomenon, but drew its driving force from the individual association of the game with cosmopolitan values, but rugby, sadly, remains largely about networking, dreams of attaining the status of petit-bourgeoisie, and kicking the rungs out from underneath you on the way up the social ladder. So, by going to rugby, Corbyn is a class traitor, I'm afraid.
Miliband overstated zero hours contracts as well. I think it's important to get these right. Not just because I like fact checks (except for my own broadbrush bollocks), but because if you overstate something you can spend too much time on it.
The Daily Mail is even more like a satire site than ever. Take this quote about his relationship with Abbott:
The inconvenient fact that Corbyn – now dubbed the Sexpot Trot – was actually still married, though living separately from his wife, seems not to have stopped them.
Shock, horror, separated man has sex with another woman...
Jimski wrote: The Daily Mail is even more like a satire site than ever. Take this quote about his relationship with Abbott:
The inconvenient fact that Corbyn – now dubbed the Sexpot Trot – was actually still married, though living separately from his wife, seems not to have stopped them.
Shock, horror, separated man has sex with another woman...
Oh, so my inference from the Telegraph piece on the previous page that he was already divorced was incorrect? In that case I'm scandalised and will protest this MADNESS by getting a bus right now to the Falklands War memorial in central Buenos Aires and loudly singing God Save The Queen whilst doing a Nazi goosestep.
It'll probably get me stabbed or at the very least beaten up, but I'm 99% sure that the Mail will have me on their front page tomorrow as some sort of TRUE BRITISH HERO.
Oh well, so much for strong and effective opposition: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/20/labour-could-back-syria-strikes-despite-corbyn-opposition-says-hilary-benn
The idea that you can solve a complex problem such as Syria via bombing is an intriguing one. Which set of thugs are they going to bomb? Assad's lot? Isis? Just bomb anyone and everyone?
They don't want to solve it, they want to bomb it. Get over there and blow up some stuff that's already been blown up. Shows decisiveness, and then the Tories can't keep saying Corbyn's a pussy.
Comment