I'm currently engrossed in Norman Davies' The Isles: A History, but even he proves unable to answer that most controversial question of who the Picts were. The aboriginal pre-Celtic inhabitants of Alba, and thus descendants of the Beaker People? P-Celts moving upwards from Cumbria? Pre-Norse Scandinavian immigrants? The northern geography of their kingdom suggests that the final theory is most probable, but in the absence of records, it seems the controversy will never be solved.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Pictish question
Collapse
X
-
The Pictish question
One thing we do know, they didn't call themselves Picts. That's from the Latin for "painted" (presumably because they liked to paint themselves blue, much like Rangers fans today).
Which at least is not a derogatory term, like "Welsh" or "Wals" was to a Saxon.
Comment
-
- Mar 2008
- 29939
- An oasis in the middle of Somerset
- Bath City FC; Porthcawl RFC;Wales in most things.
- Fig roll - deal with it.
The Pictish question
It just means 'foreigner' or 'stranger', doesn't it?
I was very interested in the Beaker People as they were much taller than other cultures and, being from a Welsh family that are all over six foot, thought that some sort of genetic Beaker strand had come through. However, as we came from a North Welsh family on my Dad's side and also have light hair and blue eyes, I now think that we are more probably the stock of a bit of Viking pillage.
Also, we don't quite look like this.
Comment
-
The Pictish question
Unsurprisingly, the Welsh get more favourable treatment in Irish, with Breatnaigh used in the historical context of original Britons (Little Britain for the nation must thus be interpreted accordingly). The more derogatory Sasanaigh for the English is self-explanatory.
Comment
Comment