Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shag your women,steal your jobs...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Shag your women,steal your jobs...

    Well, it looks like the House of Lords has given much creedence to the anti-immigration lobby with their investigation...Hell, you can even blame me for a possible house-price rise in the future.

    Flooded

    #2
    Shag your women,steal your jobs...

    shouldn't these Mourinho threads be in football?

    Comment


      #3
      Shag your women,steal your jobs...

      I object to this. I have been unable to find an immigrant who will agree to a shag

      Comment


        #4
        Shag your women,steal your jobs...

        "Small Benefit" means "benefit", doesn't it?

        Comment


          #5
          Shag your women,steal your jobs...

          Cunts. Absolute fucking cunts.

          Migration Watch - how the fuck do they get as much of a platform as they do?

          Comment


            #6
            Shag your women,steal your jobs...

            It's not Migration Watch this time, House of Lords committee rather.

            Comment


              #7
              Shag your women,steal your jobs...

              I know the report was from the Lords but the first non-political group that the BBC went to for a comment was Migration Watch. The only opposing viewpoint comes near the end of the article.

              Comment


                #8
                Shag your women,steal your jobs...

                It's good to know that this is the work of those fine upstanding citizens, Lords Wakeham, Lamont and Lawson.

                Anyway, even they appear to have said that immigrants aren't costing the economy anything.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Shag your women,steal your jobs...

                  Thanks for my first guffaw of the day Lyra.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Shag your women,steal your jobs...

                    Yeah, why are Migration Watch given more space than, say, the CBI or the Chamber of Commerce? Normally, those (and the Institute of Directors) get quoted first. Here (where the Chamber of Commerce in particular are pro-immigration) they don't get asked as much. Funny that.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Shag your women,steal your jobs...

                      Yeah, why are Migration Watch given more space than, say, the CBI or the Chamber of Commerce?
                      Or the TUC of course, who would have as much or more to say about this than all three.

                      It should be said, of course, that any pro-immigration argument that starts from the premise that migrant labour is great because it's cheap (in essence, the CBI line) is fucked up.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Shag your women,steal your jobs...

                        Yeah of course. Employers usually get asked first on other labour market issues. I was just wondering why that shouldn't be the case on this.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X