Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Truths I can’t quite believe
Collapse
X
-
The most I've ever spent on any item of clothing or shoes is £120 on a pair of smart knee-high boots. I think I once spent £100 on a coat and I spent £100 on a prom dress when I was a teenager. These days I rarely spend more than £20 on any item for myself. I just don't have that kind of cash to waste.
-
Yeah, almost the only thing I'll spend 'good money' on is shoes. I don't wear ties or jackets or that, but I buy jeans by the truckload and view them as semi-disposable. I work with people who'd spend $500+ on jeans, and I can barely keep my emotions in check when I hear that. But a good pair of shoes is key.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hot Pepsi View PostWhy would anyone pay $100 for a t-shirt or $500+ for shoes? Even if you can afford it, why pay so much when you can get the same thing, essentially, for so much less
There's still a lot of paying for the name or the label that goes on, especially by me (soz), but it's more complicated than just wanting the most expensive version. There's a long history of low income groups wanting to dress sharply, stand out, or whatever, from the Victorian Scuttlers through Teds, Mods, Casuals etc. It's partly "look what I can afford" but mostly a visible secret handshake, a signal that you understand something, that you're part of something. That's arguably more pathetic, but there you go.
These days I basically dress like a mountaineer, farmer, geography teacher or Italian yacht ponce, depending on the time of year. Jeans, t-shirt, jumper, whatever, they can be cheaper, but a good jacket and a good pair of shoes, they're expensive. The cheaper ones just aren't good enough.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Snake Plissken View Post
*waves hand*
Once you grasp that it is a mixture of carnival barkers, pantomine, audience participation and stunt work then you get the appeal.
There's no pretence that it is real life anymore and this helps a lot. It's no different to watching a serial on Netflix.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by San Bernardhinault View PostBeyond the politics...
I still find it hard to believe:
that people watch "entertainment" wrestling.
Once you grasp that it is a mixture of carnival barkers, pantomine, audience participation and stunt work then you get the appeal.
I'm with PT on the YouTuber/Instagram/Influencer thing. But then I watched a livestream of planes attempting to land at Heathrow for three hours yesterday so... *shrugs*.
Leave a comment:
-
I could explain religion, but I don’t think anyone here would care to hear about it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jah Womble View Post
That anyone can get excited about golf.
https://youtu.be/vDCGGMv50EQ
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View PostPeople buy the stuff Gwyneth Paltrow is selling
Leave a comment:
-
That folk still choose to eat meat, knowing what we do.
That folk still choose to smoke cigarettes, knowing what we do. (And I struggle with doing so still being legal.)
That folk who've somehow managed to make some kind of success of their lives - or indeed anyone with even the most basic intellectual capacity - can somehow accommodate 'Flat Earth' (alongside a number of other unscientific conspiracies).
That anyone can get excited about golf.
Put me down as a subscriber to the 'religion' and 'US/UK politics' comments upthread.
(I'm not sure I see how the Kardashians represent any kind of 'truth'. I guess HP means in the sense that their success/popularity is somehow 'real'.)
Leave a comment:
-
People buy and believe the Murdoch media. I mean, I know that ship’s sailed, but I still can’t believe it.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
"Youtuber" is a career option for young people these days
People buy the stuff Gwyneth Paltrow is selling
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hot Pepsi View Post
The Kardashians. Everything about them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ooh aah View Post
Well that applies to all combat sports, most especially boxing. To which the answer is some people just enjoy the adreneline rush of combat.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hot Pepsi View Post
That’s based on a misunderstanding of what people - at least a lot lot people - want out of a president.
EDIT: add illiterate (see his Twitter), innumerate(see his business accounts), draft dodging, borderline incestuous...Last edited by 3 Colours Red; 10-02-2020, 06:42.
Leave a comment:
-
Indeed, “pressure differential” - while true - is not a very satisfying answer for how wings work.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ay-in-the-air/
Leave a comment:
-
Airships and hydrogen balloons and hot air balloons are all lighter than air. The way they function is entirely intuitive, so it's less likely that they fall out of the sky as soon as someone thinks too hard about it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by San Bernardhinault View PostBeyond the politics...
I still find it hard to believe:
that people watch "entertainment" wrestling.
that people pay what they do to see high end sporting events and then turn up so indescribably wasted that they won't remember a thing
that heavier than air aircraft actually stay up, and the flexing of the wings is actually good and part of the design and not precursors the entire structure of the non-intuitive physics collapsing and the plane falling out of the sky
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by San Bernardhinault View Postthat people pay what they do to see high end sporting events and then turn up so indescribably wasted that they won't remember a thing
Leave a comment:
-
Beyond the politics...
I still find it hard to believe:
that people watch "entertainment" wrestling.
that people pay what they do to see high end sporting events and then turn up so indescribably wasted that they won't remember a thing
that heavier than air aircraft actually stay up, and the flexing of the wings is actually good and part of the design and not precursors the entire structure of the non-intuitive physics collapsing and the plane falling out of the sky
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jdsx View Post
Still think the original is better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmWLJmbytkk
I often think back fondly to how we were amazed that someone as obviously stupid as Reagan could be elected president.....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Amor de Cosmos View Post
I have the same feeling about lithography. I understand it's based on oil and water not mixing, but with that degree of precision? Getoutahere! Don't believe it. Not possible. But I know it is because I worked with it for so long. Still confounds me.
Leave a comment:
-
Still think the original is better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmWLJmbytkk
I often think back fondly to how we were amazed that someone as obviously stupid as Reagan could be elected president.....
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: