There's an Indy tweeter called Niki who describes herself as Indo-Cymraes and has had despicable racist abuse in response to her pro-Indy views. The threats are now being investigated by the police. The abuse is coming from supporters of the union rather than "ethnonationalists" wanting independence.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Dis-United Kingdom Thread - (Indyref 2, United Ireland poll, Welsh independence)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Diable Rouge View Post
Indeed, there's never been an election where Labour only won a majority due to Scotland and/or Wales, AFAIK, though a few where the Tories would have had the plurality.
Comment
-
Thanks for the replies and for respecting that i'm arguing in good faith. i know there are a lot of pro-union bores and bullies around and they must be exhausting to deal with.
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View PostThe thread makes a case that the current situation isn't necessarily a reason an Independent Wales couldn't afford to be Independent.
You mentioned your own defined trinity of blood, place and history and then say blackness isn't about those things. So is that your answer for why Wales should be considered a nation? Because it has those things. Almost every part of the world where black people have that trinity of claims has sought and gained independence from the UK if the UK had imposed itself on them.
ideally I'd prefer to be a citizen of The Culture, but unfortunately that isn't an option
Kirsten would not be someone that sprang to mind.
Originally posted by Lang SpoonEnglish Nationalism is the driver of the break-up more than anything.
Independence will very likely provoke an even nastier, more self-pitying turn in English nationalism, at least initially. Hopefully, the residents of Scotland and Wales will have fenced themselves off from the worst of its impact by virtue of some useful historic ethno-territorial borders. But that protection isn't available to the English working classes, and especially to BaME and foreign-born residents, plus whichever minority is Hate Group of the Month in the tabloids, who will bear its brunt. i'm not in any way claiming the Scots and Welsh are responsible for this, but i do think it is foreseeable and therefore one thing to take into account when weighing the pros and cons of voting to dissociate from England via a separate nation-state.
Originally posted by TonTonA long and interesting and challenging post... lots of what you said there, I think I should think a bit harder and longer about it.
There's a fair whack in there that I'd agree with, and yet I'm very firmly pro-indy. Primarily because I am very firmly anti-UK, and think its breaking will be a good thing for everyone. In the long run at least. Might be extra shit for us in England for a while, mind.
BLT's post is interesting and the Fanon angle clears up some of what was eluding me. i hope to come back to it when i'm less tired!
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Wow I can't think of anyone famous in my year, yours was storied with assorted movers and shakers laverte! (Also I never went to the GUU so...)
I'd imagine that unless Fish Gove and his pal George Galloway get to set the terms of the next ref residency in Scotland will be necessary to vote (the franchise limits Holyrood passed this term allow all residents 16 and older (including EU citizens, citizens of countries outwith the EU including refugees) the right to vote in it, but not me or you. And that seems fair to me).Last edited by Lang Spoon; 29-01-2021, 14:18.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Hi Laverte. I felt you've been posting in good faith. (Which is partly why I was surprised you thought that tweet thread was aimed at you.)
I think I know what you're getting at regarding the difficulties faced by some sectors if England was a separate state. I'm sceptical that Wales or Scotland can do much to alleviate that. I don't believe Wales can influence much in England, except by getting policy right and England following after which has happened a few times (both in and before the pandemic) but then becomes the bright idea of the English government. (The 5p tax on carrier bags being an example)
Plus there is the ongoing English working class animosity towards Wales. The attitudes to Wales among the "working class" often descend to the "hur hur hur sheepshaggers" comments on social media and chanted as football matches. One of the main reasons Labour didn't win the 1992 election was because Kinnock was "the Welsh windbag". His Welshness was weaponised against him. (Am well aware there are other issues with Neil and the rest of the Kinnock clan before the thread gets derailed)
So, I'm sorry, but I think putting responsibility for what happens to the English working class under a perpetually Tory government on the Indy movement is a stretch. That group needs to wake up and take control of its own destiny. (If it even truly exists any more - I queried this a while a go on the Labour thread. I'm not sure working class is the right term at all.)
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Meanwhile
The UK Government has been accused of a "deliberate and premeditated attack on devolution" after leaked documents appear to show it hid key parts of Brexit planning from the Welsh and Scottish governments.
The documents, published on political website Guido Fawkes, appear to show ministers being warned that plans for the UK to assume control of state aid "should not be shared publicly or with the devolved administrations at this stage."
https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2020-...ans-from-wales
Comment
-
Bizarre Löw Triangle Your invocation and explanation of Fanon are helping me to 'get it' at last. Thank you for that. i don't quite know how to feel about what seems like his pragmatic idealism. i mean, that's an oxymoron, and yet it does make sense. Perhaps if i had lived in Scotland more recently (or Wales ever) i wouldn't fret about the contradiction.
The popular conception of Wales or even Welshness is largely civic (i.e. based on the actually existing territorial Wales, rather than blood quanta).
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View PostHi Laverte. I felt you've been posting in good faith. (Which is partly why I was surprised you thought that tweet thread was aimed at you.)
I don't believe Wales can influence much in England, except by getting policy right and England following after which has happened a few times (both in and before the pandemic) but then becomes the bright idea of the English government.
Plus there is the ongoing English working class animosity towards Wales. The attitudes to Wales among the "working class" often descend to the "hur hur hur sheepshaggers" comments on social media and chanted as football matches.
Middle class Tories in the home counties are, to me, more obviously obnoxious and condescending towards Scots (and probably Welsh), and also more responsible for seemingly endless right-wing rule.
The occasional harassment my wife and i get when we are together in public invariably comes from white people who look and sound working class. There is no Queer Nation State (QNS) for me to escape to, and so i have no choice but to live among people who may despise and in extreme cases assault me. A minority that can vanish into its own nation state does have a kind of privilege, of which i'm probably envious.
i've been asking myself whether i would want to live in a QNS if one existed. i would be tempted. It might depend on how excited i was about the goals of the QNS. i'm not interested in living among 'my kind' for the sake of it, nor would it be enough just to want to build a fence to keep out boors and bigots. But i know i couldn't leave without taking a long look over my shoulder at what and whom i was leaving behind. Then again, i'm an instinctive alliance-builder and anti-separatist, it's almost a kneejerk reaction with me.
One of the main reasons Labour didn't win the 1992 election was because Kinnock was "the Welsh windbag". His Welshness was weaponised against him.
Kinnock had flaws but it's now shocking to remind myself how fluently and inspiringly he spoke in public ("windbagging"), compared with the tongue-tied non-entity in charge of the UK at the moment who is supposed to be a great wordsmith.
So, I'm sorry, but I think putting responsibility for what happens to the English working class under a perpetually Tory government on the Indy movement is a stretch. That group needs to wake up and take control of its own destiny.
i think the fact that the Scots and Welsh have given up trying to reform the UK or resist the English ruling classes suggests that the workers won't do better. The Tories and their propagandists are very skilled at applying divide and rule.
i'm not keen on "take control" narratives. We all need to build alliances with groups of people we're repeatedly invited to treat as suspicious, threatening, and opposed to us; meanwhile, the apparatus through which we might maintain those alliances is being taken away from us and dismantled. (Depending on your point of view, that might include the UK.)
Originally posted by Lang SpoonWow I can't think of anyone famous in my year, yours was storied with assorted movers and shakers laverte!
(Also I never went to the GUU so...)
I'd imagine that unless Fish Gove and his pal George Galloway get to set the terms of the next ref residency in Scotland will be necessary to vote (the franchise limits Holyrood passed this term allow all residents 16 or older (including EU citizens, citizens of countries outwith the EU including refugees) the right to vote in it, but not me or you. And that seems fair to me).
*A glossary for non-alumni: Glasgow university has two unions, dating from the time they were gender segregated. The GUU – the old men's union – was finally forced to admit women students in the 1960s but its gender politics had progressed barely at all when i was there in the 1990s. It's where you went to snog a future MSP, a rugby player, or a boy whose first name was a surname. The other union, the QMU, was the home of present and future goths, barflies, lesbians, dilettantes and underachievers ... and presumably Lang Spoon!
**Is there an equivalent to plastic paddies for pseudo-Scots (like me)? Silicone Sandys? Flexible Frasers?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Dilettante underachiever is my LinkedIn bio. Tbh I preferred the tower block of places to puke that was Strathclyde Union. Even if the mesh netting over the central stairwell gave a prison vibe. Or GSA for the dancey music and the arty guruls i could barely talk to.
Holyrood passed a bill setting out the franchise etc for the next Ref, but of course Westminster, and especially that slippery eel Gove, will look to fix the franchise, Ref question and timing to their advantage, should they ever grant the Section 30 order giving Big Parly consent.
there's also another poster on this thread laverte who is unequivocally in the Stronger Together camp.Last edited by Lang Spoon; 29-01-2021, 19:19.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by laverte View PostOh, apologies for the misunderstanding. i seem to be the only person on the thread defending any kind of unionism, so i supposed i might be implicated, but it's true i haven't advanced any of the arguments the twitter thread sought to refute.
i would want to restate here that a lot of the working class in England is Black, Asian or East European. i don't believe they feel animosity to Wales and Scotland to a significant degree.
i wondered about that when you mentioned Brown's dourness as a reason for Labour's defeat in 2010.
i think the fact that the Scots and Welsh have given up trying to reform the UK or resist the English ruling classes suggests that the workers won't do better. The Tories and their propagandists are very skilled at applying divide and rule.
i'm not keen on "take control" narratives. We all need to build alliances with groups of people we're repeatedly invited to treat as suspicious, threatening, and opposed to us; meanwhile, the apparatus through which we might maintain those alliances is being taken away from us and dismantled. (Depending on your point of view, that might include the UK.)Last edited by Patrick Thistle; 29-01-2021, 17:30.
Comment
-
Originally posted by laverte View Posti would want to restate here that a lot of the working class in England is Black, Asian or East European.
Originally posted by laverte View PostMiddle class Tories in the home counties are, to me, more obviously obnoxious and condescending towards Scots (and probably Welsh)
Last edited by DCI Harry Batt; 29-01-2021, 17:48.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
"Teuchters"/sheepshaggers for anyone north of the Forth Clyde canal seemed fair game in Glasgow (and was used in Fife for highlanders/Aberdeen types) while soapdodgers was applied in the reverse, culchies v Dubs/Jackeens here. Though there seems more venom when applied to Scots/Welsh from English bantz merchants, if less than when I've heard North Italians vent about "Terrone", which can be terrifying in the strength of hatred. Funnily enough blanket disparaging of "English bastards" seems pretty much beyond the pale in Scotland, certainly in half polite non-fitba society it would get disapproving looks.Last edited by Lang Spoon; 29-01-2021, 18:18.
Comment
-
Originally posted by laverte View PostBizarre Löw Triangle Your invocation and explanation of Fanon are helping me to 'get it' at last. Thank you for that. i don't quite know how to feel about what seems like his pragmatic idealism. i mean, that's an oxymoron, and yet it does make sense. Perhaps if i had lived in Scotland more recently (or Wales ever) i wouldn't fret about the contradiction.
i struggle with this. Not the civic part, but the national. Why use a territory that owes its existence and legitimacy to some kind of ethnohistory, when you are trying to keep out that kind of ethnic nationalism? i think Fanon helps, but the fact that it's convenient and intelligible and already there doesn't disguise the fact that it will still be a nation-state based within inherited boundaries, understood simultaneously as civic (where Wales is) and ethnic (where the Welsh have historically been). That worries me.
either way i'm not a civic nationalist. my main critique of civic nationalism is that it, even perfectly expressed, constructs a similar in/out divide to ethnonationalism but bases it on citizenship and congratulates itself for only dehumanising and murdering people who don't have the proper paperwork.
and anyway, those risks ought to be balanced against the actual white supremacist regime in westminster, and there's no sign the british public has had its fill of it yet.
perhaps that's a false dichototmy and it's not boris or sturgeon, but the prevailing tendency in post war Britain has been a cross party consensus for increased racist violence in the criminal justice system and the border regime. i don't think independence movements are likely to reverse that significantly, but they represent a chink in the armour. Britannia delanda est innit.
Last edited by Bizarre Löw Triangle; 29-01-2021, 20:14.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
There is a certain truth to that, in that it is relatively easy for skilled and educated minority workers here to acquire citizenship, but refugees and asylum seekers still have to deal with Direct Provision centres, which the government is slow to dismantle, knowing that the only alternative, namely providing them with social housing, would be unlikely to prove popular.
Comment
Comment