Originally posted by Sporting
View Post
There's a lot of fussbudgetry in our local ordinances, partly because we have a huge student population and certain parts of the towny population are afraid that if you give "the students" an inch, that they'll destroy the entire town. There are a lot of rules to keep the properties rented to students within a particular area around campus and downtown and a lot of rules to prevent too many people from living in a house (because more people bring more noise and more cars and more trouble, or so I've been told all my life).
That isn't entirely without a factual basis, but in my observation, the problem isn't so much with the students per se, but with the landlords. Student rentals could all be nice-looking places with well-kept yards and shrubs etc if the landlords wanted to do that, but they only do the bare minimum and there's not much incentive for their tenants to do that work because they're just temporary tenants - tragedy of the commons and all that. Yeah, it would be nice if they cared more, but they're students and they don't.
There's a lot of NIMBYs around here who complain about the students and resent them and then make a loud show of moving out to the countryside to get away from them. Of course, there'd be no town here at all, let alone one as nice as this, without students. So it's like when people in ski towns or beach towns complain about the tourists. That doesn't excuse criminal or anti-social behavior - though a lot of students seem to think it does - but we need to accept that we were all young once too and that we are one community. And fortunately, there are more than enough people who see it that way. If anything, there are too many people who want to live here. Property values around here are very healthy. There are million-dollar houses right next to frat houses.
Comment