Remember the riots in Bradford in the summer of 2001? Or the ones in Oldham? Or Stoke? Resentment and racial tension simmering all over the gaff, even manifesting itself in outbreaks of lairyness at that year's England v Pakistan ODIs. I bring it up now because – in all the breast-beating and howling and "how did we get here" and special reports from Racism Correspondents over the causes of Brexit – I've not read a single allusion to them, even in passing. This was long before austerity, the financial crash and before even 9/11. Yet these convulsions are hardly ever talked about.
I bring it up now because, I reckon, that whole late-90s/early 2000s period is as in danger of being rewritten by its winners as surely and as misleadingly as the Seventies have long been, perhaps because the mostly middle-aged, middle-class white men now writing about politics in newspapers were probably having the time of their lives at the time, tearing it right up (I was too, mostly). It's glibly assumed to be a bit of a golden age, this period, or at least one of stability, Common Sense, with no great divisions and fissures in British society. This was clearly not the case.
Of course, we had a better government then than we do now, if we're setting the bar nice and low, but from what I recall of my political activity at the time, there was still much to be angry about. I remember going on a march about the Blair government's draconian Asylum Bill in 99, which pushed us smoothly along the path of anti-immigrant legislation and a 'legitimate concerns' anti-immigrant consensus. I recall being enraged about the nascent specialist-schools and academisation programme being inveigled into the education system; pickets and protests here and there about low pay and job insecurity. All stuff that has bitten us on the arse in a major way this decade, when, according to many, Everyone Suddenly Went Mad in 2015/16.
Oh, and there was a general election that summer too. Which more than 40% of the country didn't bother voting in.
So, in summary then, the late 90s/early 2000s? Bollocks, more like. Or something.
I bring it up now because, I reckon, that whole late-90s/early 2000s period is as in danger of being rewritten by its winners as surely and as misleadingly as the Seventies have long been, perhaps because the mostly middle-aged, middle-class white men now writing about politics in newspapers were probably having the time of their lives at the time, tearing it right up (I was too, mostly). It's glibly assumed to be a bit of a golden age, this period, or at least one of stability, Common Sense, with no great divisions and fissures in British society. This was clearly not the case.
Of course, we had a better government then than we do now, if we're setting the bar nice and low, but from what I recall of my political activity at the time, there was still much to be angry about. I remember going on a march about the Blair government's draconian Asylum Bill in 99, which pushed us smoothly along the path of anti-immigrant legislation and a 'legitimate concerns' anti-immigrant consensus. I recall being enraged about the nascent specialist-schools and academisation programme being inveigled into the education system; pickets and protests here and there about low pay and job insecurity. All stuff that has bitten us on the arse in a major way this decade, when, according to many, Everyone Suddenly Went Mad in 2015/16.
Oh, and there was a general election that summer too. Which more than 40% of the country didn't bother voting in.
So, in summary then, the late 90s/early 2000s? Bollocks, more like. Or something.
Comment