Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FGM conviction.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    You’re right. The reason I got called an apologist for FGM on here was for using the term ‘male circumcision’, which your man reckoned meant I was saying ‘female circumcision’ was an equivalent thing. I was quoting the WHO and UN at the time. I cross my legs and feel a bit sick whenever FGM is discussed so I’m really not giving the two equivalence, although some boys are injured badly by circumcision.

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by MsD View Post
      You’re right. The reason I got called an apologist for FGM on here was for using the term ‘male circumcision’, which your man reckoned meant I was saying ‘female circumcision’ was an equivalent thing. I was quoting the WHO and UN at the time. I cross my legs and feel a bit sick whenever FGM is discussed so I’m really not giving the two equivalence, although some boys are injured badly by circumcision.
      Who had a go at you for that (I hope it's not me)?



      Comment


        #53
        No, no, it was ages ago, but the injustice still rankles. The thread's since disappeared.

        Comment


          #54
          As posted in its own thread, Christopher Chope has blocked new FGM legislation.

          https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham...gm-legislation

          Comment


            #55
            If we're talking "special places in hell" …

            Comment


              #56
              A misogynistic shitbag pretending it's about parliamentary procedure.

              Comment

              Working...
              X