Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Murdoch scum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    https://twitter.com/jimrutenberg/status/1314920457003503616

    Comment


      https://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/1326279626763735041?s=21

      Comment


        Well, yeah, except Turnbull did 3/5ths of fuck all when he was, you know, the actual Prime Minister. He's spot on about Murdoch mind.

        Comment


          News Corp in court against the taxman today:

          Comment


            https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1350993717948272641

            Comment


              https://twitter.com/sarahellison/status/1351668362917670919

              Comment


                Fantastic analysis of Murdoch for his 90th birthday

                https://twitter.com/ta_mills/status/1370093605390548998?s=21

                Comment


                  I'll just leave this here -


                  https://twitter.com/ShippersUnbound/...19019390033927

                  Comment


                    How the S*n has reported the death of Max Mosley

                    https://twitter.com/EOSHD/status/1396833033764974595

                    Comment


                      The BBC headline in my RSS feed ascribed to him a "dizzying intellect", which seems to be a tad extreme in the other direction.

                      Comment


                        https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1403383273993166859

                        Comment


                          https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...droidApp_Other

                          Sun pays damages but admits no wrongdoing. Very bizarre.

                          Comment


                            Not unusual in US litigation, motivated by concern that an admission can be used against them by other victims

                            The prospective damages they are now likely to have to pay in these cases are not unrelated to their decision to write the paper's value down to zero

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by ursus arctos View Post
                              Not unusual in US litigation, motivated by concern that an admission can be used against them by other victims

                              The prospective damages they are now likely to have to pay in these cases are not unrelated to their decision to write the paper's value down to zero
                              Thanks for that. Would the link between the two not be clear and affect future claims?

                              Comment


                                Other claimants would have to establish that they had in fact been hacked themselves, but as more cases of the hacking of others are established, the presumption begins to shift in favour of it having been done on an industrial scale.

                                This is also why it is increasingly the case that the victims are being represented by a limited group of counsel who have developed relevant expertise and can give victims a good chance of a substantial recovery.

                                Comment


                                  That makes sense. Thanks UA.

                                  Comment


                                    Worth reading on Murdoch

                                    Evidence that Rebekah Brooks knew about the hacking (of course she fucking did)

                                    https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy/status/1403623193752092675?s=20

                                    Comment


                                      https://twitter.com/davidallengreen/status/1400513328594800647

                                      Comment


                                        https://twitter.com/drevanharris/status/1404683637866569728

                                        Comment


                                          Given the allegations about Murdoch and the lengths he went to use those criminal connections involved in the Morgan case to destroy competititors

                                          Including Canal plus and ITV

                                          I'm always surprised that there aren't more people working to bring him down

                                          Comment


                                            Today's editor of the Daily Express Gary Jones.



                                            Later that day Jones called Rees back to say the accounts department wanted more detail in the invoices. Rees became cross, at which point the reason for the vague wording became very clear.

                                            ‘This is tiresome, fucking tiresome,’ he said. ‘We are not going to put the numbers in there because what we are doing is illegal, isn’t it? I don’t want people coming in and nicking us for a criminal offence, you know.’


                                            Comment


                                              https://twitter.com/dansabbagh/status/1404762651675271168?s=20

                                              Comment


                                                https://twitter.com/adavies4/status/1404762510025240578?s=20

                                                for a moment- as with the hacking scandal,- we can glimpse quite how corrupt this country has been- and is.

                                                Comment



                                                  Cressida Dick, the commissioner of the Metropolitan police, has been personally censured for hampering an inquiry into police corruption in the long-running Daniel Morgan murder case.

                                                  The report of an independent panel inquiring into his death in 1987 found that the Met was “institutionally corrupt” in its handling of the case and accused the force of placing concerns about its reputation above properly investigating. It said the Met misled the public and Morgan’s grieving family.

                                                  It said the Met delayed handing over vital documents, which then delayed the work of the panel, which was set up in 2013 but is only able to report now, eight years later.

                                                  The report criticised police delays in giving access to a police sensitive database, called “Holmes”: “The panel has never received any reasonable explanation for the refusal over seven years by [then] Assistant Commissioner Dick and her successors to provide access to the Holmes accounts to the Daniel Morgan independent panel.”

                                                  Comment


                                                    Wrong thread people?

                                                    UK Polis rather than Murdoch?

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...
                                                    X