Murdoch scum
Maybe she didn't know if they were illegal or not.
Maybe she didn't know if they were illegal or not.
-
-
-
Murdoch scum
You searched faster than me...
Anyway, utterly fucking ridiculous. Time to do away with juries...Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Innocent as fuck!Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Great payoff Brooks got, seeing she must be utterly incompetent.
Don't you get the sack when you're incompetent?
The inadmissible evidence could be quite something. She's not in the clear yet.
I'd love someone rich who hates tabloids, like Max Mosley, to say "Innocent, my arse, sue me!"Comment
-
Murdoch scum
I'm not sure the occasional verdict you think is wrong is a good enough reason to do away with juries.Gangster Octopus wrote: You searched faster than me...
Anyway, utterly fucking ridiculous. Time to do away with juries...Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Funny to think what a massive principle it was considered when Labour took away opting for jury trial from some cases. No-one seems to care much about that now.Disco Child Ballads wrote:I'm not sure the occasional verdict you think is wrong is a good enough reason to do away with juries.Originally posted by Gangster OctopusComment
-
Murdoch scum
Cunting fucking arseholes.Comment
-
Murdoch scum
If I'm Glenn Mulcaire, I'm thinking £10.8m for Brooks....Comment
-
Murdoch scum
After all the shredding, all the deleting and all the hiding of laptops behind bins, not one person is guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice?
Really?Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Charlie Brooks said he was embarrassed he had porn on the computer and a novel.blameless wrote: After all the shredding, all the deleting and all the hiding of laptops behind bins, not one person is guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice?
Really?
I mean, I'd do exactly the same. Run like fuck from the police.
It's just the way I wasn't brought up.Comment
-
Murdoch scum
You're making the mistake of thinking that they actually care how it looks.blameless wrote: After all the shredding, all the deleting and all the hiding of laptops behind bins, not one person is guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice?
Really?Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Be fair though, Charlie grew up as a black man in Brixton in the seventies.Comment
-
Murdoch scum
You're making the mistake of thinking that they actually care how it looks.
I know the accused - sorry, the acquitted - don't care that they come across as dodgy bastards, but how fucking stupid were the members of the jury?
"Well, they were clearly destroying evidence, but only for the best of motives - not guilty."Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Obviously. I was just exaggerating for effect.Disco Child Ballads wrote:I'm not sure the occasional verdict you think is wrong is a good enough reason to do away with juries.Originally posted by Gangster OctopusComment
-
Murdoch scum
I've always been of the opinion you can judge someone's character by the calibre of their friends.*
And with friends like these, I, for one, will also defend Mr Coulson against anyone impugning his character.
2nd Edit.
Post the link!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/hacking-trial-piers-morgan-and-louise-mensch-declare-support-for-andy-coulson-and-rebekah-brooks-following-verdict-9559721.html
* In the words of the song, it's also true "You can tell a man who boozes, by the company he chooses. And the pig got up and slowly walked away…"Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Next time I predict something, tell me to fuck off...johnr wrote: Here's my entirely spurious prediction, 2/3 of the way through the case:
Brooks will get off knowing about phone hacking, Coulson and Kuttner will be found guilty.
She, her assistant and her husband and the other fella will be found guilty of perverting the course of justice, and making illegal payments.
Thought you'd all like to know.Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Only a bit, it seemed to me.Gangster Octopus wrote:Obviously. I was just exaggerating for effect.Originally posted by Disco Child Ballads
Where do they get these swallowers of cock and bull stories from?Comment
-
Murdoch scum
8 women 3 men, apparently. Probably explains persistent references to Brooks IVF the police raid upsetting the baby and Carter confusing MI5 and MFI
Tabloid editors know how to write a story.
One question for our legal visitors. One of the meetings at one of the Cotswold houses was after/ continuing coaching for the select committee ( the one where Brooks said they paid Police officers). Did that not given an opportunity to discuss a the select committee and b coaching? Why were neither of those lines adopted?Comment
-
Murdoch scum
The jury have some queries to the judge on the other counts re Coulson and Goodman.Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Comma gain?Tubby Isaacs wrote: Where do they get these swallowers of cock and bull stories from?Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Oh Christ.Comment
-
Murdoch scum
That's like when I said "Jesus, fucking young people".Comment
-
Murdoch scum
Anti-establishment Andrew Neil making a right tit of himself on Twitter.Comment
-
Murdoch scum
That isn't how criminal trials work, is it? You can't assume the worst, you have to prove they were doing it for that reason. It always sounded like the prosecution case against Wade was in trouble when they were bringing 'She must have known through pillow talk' into it.blameless wrote: I know the accused - sorry, the acquitted - don't care that they come across as dodgy bastards, but how fucking stupid were the members of the jury?
"Well, they were clearly destroying evidence, but only for the best of motives - not guilty."
Civil actions on the other hand...
People have settled with News International, but that doesn't stop them going after individuals personally, does it?Comment
Comment