Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Annoying New York Times articles
Collapse
X
-
Douthat used to get a lot of mileage out of being a Professional Catholic.
I wonder if he is re-considering his conversion.
Leave a comment:
-
"Which is fair enough: The old ruling class was bigoted and exclusive and often cruel, it had failures aplenty"
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, of course. FFS.
I suppose the white ruling class of yore (which includes some non-protestants, I suppose.) was more pragmatic and technically competent, and perhaps less absolutist in their ideology, than the current GOP, but that's not saying a whole lot. It's gotten worse for a lot of reasons, but it's sure as hell not the fault of "meritocracy" or "diversity."
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Hot Pepsi View PostThat really takes the fucking biscuit, doesn't it? Who wrote it?
https://twitter.com/JuliusGoat/status/1070306302956576768
Edit: ahhh damn, I can't hide the previous tweet which tells you the answer
Leave a comment:
-
This one ticks many of the boxes but the development it describes may actually be encouraging.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/04/s...orefronts.html
Leave a comment:
-
Not in the NYT, but related to the kinds of tone-deaf bits they do.
This piece takes down the trend of hotels (and apartments) that are insanely tiny, but only slightly cheaper than a human-sized space, but try to distract guests/renters with lots of "curated" bullshit.
https://theoutline.com/post/5709/wel...=2&zi=jdcaz3wh
I would argue that this is, to some extent, just the non plus ultra of a trend - perhaps a fact - of hotels and apartments everywhere, which is that it is damn near impossible to just buy what you want at a fair price. Last time I was in the apartment game in the DC area, all I wanted was four walls and a roof that didn't leak, a lock on the door, reliable plumbing and electricity, reasonable quiet, and no roaches. That simply isn't available. If you want those things, you also have to pay for a on site pool, on-site half-ass "gym," marble floors in the lobby, and various other services and amenities that no healthy person in their 30s needs or really wants. Of course, all of this is sold as "luxury," but it's not even that. It's just extraneous. But these places still turned out to be more affordable than any of the places that offered actual luxury, of course, or anywhere much closer to anywhere I wanted to be. People like me couldn't really afford to think in terms of cost per square foot. They can only think in terms of the total cost.*
But this "curated" microhotel/microapartment bullshit is just taking that sad fact of life for so many people and trying to to turn it into some kind of bohemian hipster thing that people should pay top dollar for. It's the housing equivalent of a $350 plaid flannel shirt.
The only apartments I've lived in where I felt like I wasn't getting ripped off were in places owned by individuals who were just trying to make a little hassle-free investment income while mostly hoping just to park their money in a property that will rise in value. Because they're the ones dealing with the tenants directly, its too their advantage to make that relationship as friendly as possible. But big developers and property managers are, apparently, more inclined to try to squeeze every dollar out of it and don't mind if there's a lot of turnover and frustration. They're underpaying staff to handle it all anyway, so it's no sweat off their back to make those people's jobs a bit harder by pissing-off the tenants.
Anyway...
This really takes the cake. People who make $155k telling other people their age how to be "frugal."
https://theoutline.com/post/3840/fru...ty-millennialsLast edited by Hot Pepsi; 05-12-2018, 14:00.
Leave a comment:
-
This has been doing the rounds recently, to wide derision from everyone. But particularly scathingly from actual Angelenos. It's quite astonishing in all kinds of ways.
Leave a comment:
-
If you get it in cash, you could buy somewhere down here, WOM.
Yes cash. Property purchases in Argentina are paid for in suitcases of actual US dollars.
Leave a comment:
-
I could certainly get into a reasonably salubrious mobile-home park in Ft Myers with my half. Which would suit me just fine.
Leave a comment:
-
My experience in the US compared with the UK was that the people in the US who did building inspections and so in didn't seem to have any legal liability, gave vague sort of reports if anything, and the whole show was very superficial. The UK surveyor handed me an 80 page report full of all kinds of thing, covering their arses on the tiniest risks of maybe a hint of decay in a joist somewhere, or whatever. I think UK surveyors can be in big financial trouble from mortgage lenders if they fail to spot problems that damage the value of the house. Our US inspection was - I think - voluntary, not needed by the mortgage company at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by San Bernardhinault View PostMy experience in the US compared with the UK was that the people in the US who did building inspections and so in didn't seem to have any legal liability, gave vague sort of reports if anything, and the whole show was very superficial. The UK surveyor handed me an 80 page report full of all kinds of thing, covering their arses on the tiniest risks of maybe a hint of decay in a joist somewhere, or whatever. I think UK surveyors can be in big financial trouble from mortgage lenders if they fail to spot problems that damage the value of the house. Our US inspection was - I think - voluntary, not needed by the mortgage company at all.
In every US state I'm familiar with, the seller is legally obligated to disclose certain things, like if the house ever had termites.
After the inspection, you can try to chisel the seller down a bit, get them to agree to pay for certain repairs, or agree to split the costs of certain things that need to happen. Like with this house, I got the seller to help pay for the radon thing and fix the drain in the downstairs bathtub, which still is kinda not fixed. I think it's just inherently too narrow or something.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WOM View PostIn multiple-offer Toronto of last summer, you'd get 10 or 12 people bidding on a house - with all conditions waived. So, nothing conditional upon financing, inspection, etc. Apparently these would immediately put you out of the running.
Leave a comment:
-
My experience in the US compared with the UK was that the people in the US who did building inspections and so in didn't seem to have any legal liability, gave vague sort of reports if anything, and the whole show was very superficial. The UK surveyor handed me an 80 page report full of all kinds of thing, covering their arses on the tiniest risks of maybe a hint of decay in a joist somewhere, or whatever. I think UK surveyors can be in big financial trouble from mortgage lenders if they fail to spot problems that damage the value of the house. Our US inspection was - I think - voluntary, not needed by the mortgage company at all.
Leave a comment:
-
In multiple-offer Toronto of last summer, you'd get 10 or 12 people bidding on a house - with all conditions waived. So, nothing conditional upon financing, inspection, etc. Apparently these would immediately put you out of the running.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostYeah, the "Maker Academy" raises the possibility that he was previously a tech bro or banker who wasn't making a teacher's salary.
It does look like they didn't do a structural inspection, which isn't unheard of here, but is pretty stupid given the nature of the housing stock (visual inspections/walk throughs are generally required for mortgages)
A regular inspection might not turn-up structural issues, but for that amount of money and that house, they should have hired one.
On the other hand, it sounds like they would have bought it anyway or some other dumbass would have at that price.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: