Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Attacks on journalism latest

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Attacks on journalism latest

    Really important case, this:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/21/pressandpublishing.medialaw

    #2
    Attacks on journalism latest

    Can we do this to Shaka hislop? Subpoena his notes so we can see whether he actually ever watches MLS games?

    Comment


      #3
      Attacks on journalism latest

      E10, what kind of legal protections do English journalists have when it comes to protecting sources and notes?

      This seems incredibly overbroad and completely disproportionate (in other words, just what I've come to expect from this government).

      Comment


        #4
        Attacks on journalism latest

        Ursus, protection of sources is a pretty sacrosanct (though not legally unshrined) professional-conduct issue. I think the law's largely based on precedent, though I'm not certain exactly how it's framed, if it's framed at all. Most things here aren't.

        Here's one such precedent from quite recently
        http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=38367&c=1

        Comment


          #5
          Attacks on journalism latest

          Why must every article of this nature use either "chilling effect" or "slippery slope" at some point. Seems they're used so often they've sort of lost their effectiveness. Almost as bad as "we believe this sends a message", as far as empty sentiments go.

          Comment


            #6
            Attacks on journalism latest

            E10, thanks for that. I wasn't sure if there was established precedent, and I wondered what the legal basis for it was. As you know, I very much think that you would be better off with a written constitution.

            WoM, the "slippery slope" argument is lazy (and one of the first things we are taught to argue against in law school), but it is also extremely well-entrenched in legal discourse. And the "chilling effect" of this kind of over-reaching by the government is very much the larger point at issue, not mentioning it would be like discussing plans to build new coal-burning power plants without referencing global warming.

            Comment


              #7
              Attacks on journalism latest

              Seems they're used so often they've sort of lost their effectiveness.
              Still, Jacqui Smith's cleavage eh, what about it, would you eh? Eh?! *snort*

              The current headline on the BBC is slagging her off over the Police pay award. The journalist story is not even shown.

              "...give you Rule Britannia, gassy beer, Page 3, 2 weeks in Espana and Sunday Striptease..."

              Comment


                #8
                Attacks on journalism latest

                Ursus- would a written const. really help that much?

                The State guarantees liberty for the exercise of the following rights, subject to public order and morality:

                The right of the citizens to express freely their convictions and opinions.

                The education of public opinion being, however, a matter of such grave import to the common good, the State shall endeavour to ensure that organs of public opinion, such as the radio, the press, the cinema, while preserving their rightful liberty of expression, including criticism of Government policy, shall not be used to undermine public order or morality or the authority of the State
                (Constitution of Southern Ireland, Article 40 (extract)

                Bill: is there anything we can do to temper Worcester Woman's excesses? Might she return to her old job as an obscure head teacher in Malvern?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Attacks on journalism latest

                  Dunc, in my view, a written constitution would at least provide a tangible basis for judicial rulings and a brake on the unbridled exercise of executive power. Given what this Bush administration has done in a system with those checks and balances, the thought of what they would have done in the absence of the Constitution genuinely terrifies me.

                  Of course, as your example so eloquently demonstrates, exactly what is written down can make a big difference.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Attacks on journalism latest

                    Indeed. Obviously a bad written constitution isn't a good thing. A good one, however, is.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Attacks on journalism latest

                      Antonio Gramsci wrote:
                      Can we do this to Shaka hislop? Subpoena his notes so we can see whether he actually ever watches MLS games?
                      Tee hee.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Attacks on journalism latest

                        Dunc: make her the new manager of Chelsea?

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X