Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pedants are wrong

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • evilC
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    hobbes wrote:
    A semi colon links two unrelated clauses. A comma links related clauses.
    Yep - that as well. That's a given. However, are these 'parallel' practical uses that I mentioned valid too?

    Leave a comment:


  • hobbes
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    A semi colon links two unrelated clauses. A comma links related clauses.

    Leave a comment:


  • evilC
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    hobbes wrote:
    And, wrong on lots of counts are.
    You should never use a comma after the word "and."
    This is another one that I (like, I presume, Hobbes) was taught at school but which I'm pretty sure has been debunked now.

    Here is a related question for the grammaticists on the thread, though: I was also taught that a comma can represent a slight pause in sentence (as if when spoken). I presume this is what is going on in the sentence that Hobbes has quoted. The same applies to a semi-colon, but with the pause being slightly longer. Is this true, or is this grammatical bastardisation?

    Leave a comment:


  • kugelrund
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    I had an argument about number 4 last year, with an English friend who teaches English to French people. He was staunchly, even abusively, in the 'none is always singular' camp. I'm going to send him that link, along with a lot of gros mots.

    Leave a comment:


  • Crusoe
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    Not always true, surely?

    Leave a comment:


  • hobbes
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    And, wrong on lots of counts are.
    You should never use a comma after the word "and."

    Leave a comment:


  • evilC
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    I'm glad about no.3 too, as it clears up my confusion about it. I was one of those who, as a child, was taught that it was bad so have avoided committing that apparently cardinal sin ever since. However, I'd seen increasingly frequent examples of such sentences recently and this threw me into confusion. Y'see, if starting a sentence with 'and' I had adopted the 'technique' of preceding it with '...' just to indicate that it was some kind of continuation of a point made in my previous sentence. But now I know the facts I realise I can stop that habit. And will act accordingly in future. (Ah, that felt good!)

    Leave a comment:


  • Taylor
    replied
    Pedants are wrong

    Number 3 had me cheering. I've been making that argument since I was still at school, and it's one grammatical "rule" I almost always break in my writing. Much of this stuff is actually worth observing, even if it may not be correct, simply because it results in more elegant sentences. But that one is just a load of crap.

    You can only break the "rule" sparingly, mind you, or you do sound like an idiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest started a topic Pedants are wrong

    Pedants are wrong

    And, wrong on lots of counts are.
Working...
X