After his raspberry beer lapse Bog Annette returns to the rightful path
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AEB Scramble
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Moonlight shadow View PostHeard a few jubilant people saying it will be easier to beat France than Belgium in the final down the pub i was visiting earlier. It is slowly turning into the usual, alas...
Similarly it is assumed "we" would have beaten Argentina and the Czech Republic had "we" won the 1990 and 1996 semis.Last edited by Satchmo Distel; 10-07-2018, 23:31.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Satchmo Distel View PostThese same idiots were saying, before the quarters, that Belgium would be easier than Brazil in the final.
Similarly it is assumed "we" would have beaten Argentina and the Czech Republic had "we" won the 1990 and 1996 semis.
However I grew up being told by my older brother and my dad that we'd have won the World Cup in 1970 if Bobby Charlton hadn't been substituted, conveniently ignoring we would have had to get though Italy (which W Germany failed to do of course) for the right to get hammered by Brazil.Last edited by Walt Flanagans Dog; 11-07-2018, 07:40.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walt Flanagans Dog View PostI don't have a problem with either of those assumptions - Argentina had four players suspended for the final, and others injured, and a home final against the Czech Republic was winnable.
However I grew up being told by my older brother and my dad that we'd have won the World Cup in 1970 if Bobby Charlton hadn't been substituted, conveniently ignoring we would have had to get though Italy (which W Germany failed to do of course) for the right to get hammered by Brazil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flynnie View PostThat isn't even canon, the point is England would have faced Brazil in the final and then who knows. Which was reasonable, since Brazil had to work for it in the group stage.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Walt Flanagans Dog View PostTrue, though the wider point is they would have had to beat Italy to get there in the first place, and that would have been by no means guaranteed - that part is often overlooked in the re-telling of the 1970 story.
Remember too, in this alternate universe England keep their 2-0 lead and don't have to play an extra half-hour in boiling hot León. It's possible West Germany breaks down Italy sooner and wins if not for that.
Comment
-
I'm guessing Colin Bell was warming up in a very obviously going on in a moment way before Bonetti dived right over Beckenbauer's shot, giving rise to the myth that Charlton was substituted, freeing Beckenbauer from his responsibility.
Comment
-
- Mar 2008
- 9819
- Tyne 'n' Wear (emphasis on the 'n')
- Dundee Utd, Gladbach, Atleti, Napoli, New Orleans Saints, Elgin City
Watched this one, after trying the ignore it/boycott in previous rounds.
Worked a treat, fully enjoyable evening (after the uncomfortable 1st 30...) in company of a postdoc from Greenock (28, far louder than me in his ABE pronouncements); an East German history lecturer (neutral, would've been happy to support England if there'd been any call for it); his wife, a Chinese banker (very loud and enthusiastic ABE, I wonder if her 28-month travails getting the right to move here with her husband was a contributory factor..?); a Ghanaian social worker; Ms Felicity (Anglo-Scot, brought up in Norwich, couldn't face the screen she was so convinced it was coming home...) and 4 English people (Newcastle, Grimsby, 2xForest) who took the revolutionary defeatist position Lenin outlined in WW1 ('the main enemy is at home').
The ABE/AEB can now stand down for some well-deserved R n R. Hasta la proxima!
Comment
-
We must steel ourselves and stay vigilant, there is still a third place play-off for them to lose!
Only joking, who cares about that, let’s all enjoy the rest of the World Cup again like we did before the unpleasantness began to unfold.
Hvala, Hrvatska!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ad hoc View PostThose figures are as skewed as his spelling of Belgium. (I think the point is well made mind you, but there is some serious revisionism in those figures. Stones' header last night? Kane's first bad attempt when he should have scored in the first half? )
Comment
Comment