Generally a poor game tonight - maybe not technically for those who love to analyze details, but as a spectacle there was little to entertain thanks to a shocking paucity of clear-cut chances. And I think that was largely down to the rule allowing yellow cards to be wiped after the quarter-finals. It was a very physical contest, with heaps of tactical fouls, and it was clear that both teams had been instructed to do this - after all, if there's no prospect of suspension for getting a yellow card, then why not use that as part of your tactical armory. How many yellow cards were there tonight? Eleven?
So a cynical but inevitable consequence of a rule that's meant to be a compassionate sop to all those observers who moan about what a shame that so and so will miss the biggest match of his career. It's bollocks. If you don't want to be suspended, don't commit the fouls. After all, why have 23 players in a squad? It tests a squad's depth and versatility when they have to reach to the bench and make adjustments. This rule is just another way to protect the commercial interests of the tournament by ensuring big name players don't miss the biggest game.
So a cynical but inevitable consequence of a rule that's meant to be a compassionate sop to all those observers who moan about what a shame that so and so will miss the biggest match of his career. It's bollocks. If you don't want to be suspended, don't commit the fouls. After all, why have 23 players in a squad? It tests a squad's depth and versatility when they have to reach to the bench and make adjustments. This rule is just another way to protect the commercial interests of the tournament by ensuring big name players don't miss the biggest game.
Comment