...what elements would we include? Most of our current ones came from the Victorian era, and involved to greater or lesser degree the ethics of teamwork; the concept that there were roles in every team for those of all shapes and sizes; and that there were, even within the team structure, specialist roles (goalkeeper, penalty kicker) that would significantly influence the overall outcome. It was all a pretty flimsy allegory to prepare children for life in a battalion at the front, to be honest.
What would a 21st century team sport - from scratch - have to accommodate? T20 in the cricket is the closest anyone's come to creating one, and in truth it's less a team sport than a brutal contest between two particular individuals, the batsman and the bowler. It's like tennis with the ballboys fielding.
Would anyone invent a sport, now, that even risked serious physical injury? Scrimmages? Scrums? I think probably not. Tackles, even? God forbid, people flailing deadly weapons at each other like in Ireland?
Would sheer brute force and strength still be something to be promoted, and rewarded, in the rules, or guile and technique? We'd all like to think the latter, but then all everyone mentions about certain modern players is their sheer physical presence, size or pace.
If you were a teacher at a school now, tasked with coming up "with something like those chaps at Eton and Rugby have come up with", what would your new sport look like?
What would a 21st century team sport - from scratch - have to accommodate? T20 in the cricket is the closest anyone's come to creating one, and in truth it's less a team sport than a brutal contest between two particular individuals, the batsman and the bowler. It's like tennis with the ballboys fielding.
Would anyone invent a sport, now, that even risked serious physical injury? Scrimmages? Scrums? I think probably not. Tackles, even? God forbid, people flailing deadly weapons at each other like in Ireland?
Would sheer brute force and strength still be something to be promoted, and rewarded, in the rules, or guile and technique? We'd all like to think the latter, but then all everyone mentions about certain modern players is their sheer physical presence, size or pace.
If you were a teacher at a school now, tasked with coming up "with something like those chaps at Eton and Rugby have come up with", what would your new sport look like?
Comment