Why does television coverage of sports seem to be increasingly centred around the tear-jerker? I noticed this watching Setanta the other day and seeing their little video "we will be there". It seems to be meant to evoke some weird maudlin nostalgia. How is that related to football?
I've also noticed it in coverage of the Olympic Games - it's almost as if they seek out those athletes who have had some personal tragedy on their past and focus relentlessly on it (preferably recent past...the coverage of Joannie Rochette and the death of her mother this week just creates this tidal wave of sappiness). It's almost to the point where I feel that networks would like more sports to have judges awarding points not only for artistic merit but also for "degree of personal tragedy overcome". You know, so that the hard-luck athlete whose long-time coach passed away last week could get bumped from fifth to third and there'd be more feel-good all around.
Is it just my imagination that this phenomenon is becoming more pronounced or has it always been this way? I'm really starting to get annoyed by it.
I've also noticed it in coverage of the Olympic Games - it's almost as if they seek out those athletes who have had some personal tragedy on their past and focus relentlessly on it (preferably recent past...the coverage of Joannie Rochette and the death of her mother this week just creates this tidal wave of sappiness). It's almost to the point where I feel that networks would like more sports to have judges awarding points not only for artistic merit but also for "degree of personal tragedy overcome". You know, so that the hard-luck athlete whose long-time coach passed away last week could get bumped from fifth to third and there'd be more feel-good all around.
Is it just my imagination that this phenomenon is becoming more pronounced or has it always been this way? I'm really starting to get annoyed by it.
Comment