Originally posted by Doraemon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Media coverage
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sporting View PostMedia coverage in Spanish sports newspapers has been pretty good and free of comparisons with the men's game, The only aspect I find annoying is their habit of calling female players by their first names whereas in the case of males surnames are used,
I'm not sure whether cause and effect are getting confused here, though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Janik View PostVery common in English as well. See the study that quite a few outlets reported on this week, such as the Indy - https://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...-a8428916.html
I'm not sure whether cause and effect are getting confused here, though.
Comment
-
We've talked about this in the context of tennis before.
Now that I think about, it is interesting that the NBA's conscious shift to being about "stars, not teams" has been accompanied by an increasing embrace of first names as a primary identifier (see LeBron, Steph, Giannis, Kawhi, etc).
Comment
-
Going back to what Furtho said, I sometimes feel self conscious enthusing about female players because it makes it sound like I've got a bit of a thing for them. I loved Laura Bassett at the last world cup because she was uncompromising and carried on playing with a black eye after one of the French players tried to smash her cheekbone with an elbow. Bassett just didn't give a fuck; just got up and went back to it. I really admire that in any player. But if I say I "love" her that feels a bit wrong. (But I'd say that about a male player and I don't think anyone would care.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostWe've talked about this in the context of tennis before.
Now that I think about, it is interesting that the NBA's conscious shift to being about "stars, not teams" has been accompanied by an increasing embrace of first names as a primary identifier (see LeBron, Steph, Giannis, Kawhi, etc).
However, the dynamic for more journeyman players is rather more gender based. In terms of British Tennis, the current second ranked players are Cameron Norrie and Katie Boulter. Of the two, I'm much more likely to feel that referring to Boulter as Katie flows naturally in conversation despite that being ambiguous in certain contexts (there are a whole battalion of Tennis playing Katie's out there) than calling Norrie 'Cameron', which just sounds clunky. There certainly is some form of gender bias in that.
Comment
-
TG4's coverage is perfectly competent, but faced with the usual problem they have when covering sports outside of the GAA - they can get sportspeople to act as co-commentators (and to be fair, they've opted for gender balance here), but finding someone with good Irish is another matter - at least the person here is making an effort, unlike some ex-rugby players.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View PostWhile I agree with most of what Janik said I want to try and avoid making a virtue out of watching women's sport. If you didn't watch France v Korea last night you missed a good game. That should be reason enough to watch imo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diable Rouge View PostTG4's coverage is perfectly competent, but faced with the usual problem they have when covering sports outside of the GAA - they can get sportspeople to act as co-commentators (and to be fair, they've opted for gender balance here), but finding someone with good Irish is another matter - at least the person here is making an effort, unlike some ex-rugby players.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Furtho View PostI understand this isn't exactly Janik's point, but at the end of the domestic season just finished I attended a couple of local women's games in the lower reaches of the pyramid. During the matches I texted a few friends with comments on the play. One of them responded with a comment passed on from his girlfriend that I must be "a dirtbag" to do such a thing on my own; someone else sent me a link to one of the players' saucy Instagram account.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Janik View PostI don't see that as disagreeing with what I wrote. Though I'm not sure you are suggesting it does. What I'm after is the ongoing normalisation of Women playing Football until it's all just seen as Football. For people to consume this as they would consume a Men's World Cup.
The problem is, and will be for a while, that the women’s domestic club game is still not drawing very well. Of course, there’s a catch-22 in that it would do better if it had more competent deep-pocketed investors and it will only get those if there’s some hope of a long term ROI or, at least, prestige and social cachet for the owners, and the only way that either one of those happens is if becomes more popular.
It seems like they need to find a way to partner with MLS because MLS has the good stadiums. Playing on AstroTurf in second rate college football stadiums is not going to draw fans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Janik View PostI suppose there is something to be said about gender equality in a man suffering this. I suspect most female Football fans could offer a similar story or two with such reactions to them watching Men's games. Possibly more prevalent 10-20 years ago now, though?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostRecord ratings in France: 44 percent audience share,
https://twitter.com/tf1pro/status/1137253655143432192?s=21"]https://twitter.com/tf1pro/status/1137253655143432192
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Janik View PostI don't see that as disagreeing with what I wrote. Though I'm not sure you are suggesting it does. What I'm after is the ongoing normalisation of Women playing Football until it's all just seen as Football. For people to consume this as they would consume a Men's World Cup.
I think what I'm inexpertly articulating is that what I'd like is for people to watch women's football because it's football and not out of a sense of they should make an effort to watch women's football because it's women and therefore a worthy cause to be supported. That might be exactly what you're saying too.
I really enjoyed the women's international I went to the other night. The atmosphere was different. There were loads of kids and families there. No drunken sweary louts. No tossers chanting obscenity. It was a pleasant evening with a competitive game and Wales won! I really enjoyed it in a way that I don't always enjoy going to men's football. (At Arsenal earlier this year my friend challenged a bigot standing behind us who was shouting homophobic slurs. It just made it a toxic experience.) I'm going to go to future women's internationals because it was enjoyable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hot Pepsi View Post
I’ve felt like that. I never feel comfortable going to a women’s soccer, women’s volleyball, or women’s ice hockey game by myself. And I certainly wouldn’t go to the women’s gymnastics without a female friend. Otherwise I fear that people will think I’m a perv. I worry too much what other people think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hot Pepsi View PostThe normalization of gambling will help with that, I think.
* - there are two High Street betting shops in my town of ~18,000. Each with comprehensive window displays of popular options to gamble on. Nobody could be in any doubt what service the shop is selling. Previously I've found some Americans a bit taken aback by how open this all is in Britain.
Comment
-
I would posit that the impact of gambling may well be very different in the US and UK.
There is a long tradition in the UK that brings with it a certain conservatism (and male chauvinism) that isn't anywhere near as entrenched over here.
Just as attendance trends have diverged to a certain extent in North America and the ContinentLast edited by ursus arctos; 08-06-2019, 18:10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View PostI think what I'm inexpertly articulating is that what I'd like is for people to watch women's football because it's football and not out of a sense of they should make an effort to watch women's football because it's women and therefore a worthy cause to be supported. That might be exactly what you're saying too.
I guess what I'm advocating is an amount of deliberate obtuseness when someone resists the idea that it's all just Football. And also flagging up that we, on here, maybe haven't previously walked the walk on this front.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Janik View PostNot quite. It's where I want the world to be, certainly. But I think it's going to take some work to achieve that, and I'm not sure it can be achieved by the media organisations simply promoting the thing better as the push they have given in the past hasn't been matched by uptake. But it's not hard work, we just need to behave like it's already the case and that will help make it more likely to become generally true.
I guess what I'm advocating is an amount of deliberate obtuseness when someone resists the idea that it's all just Football. And also flagging up that we, on here, maybe haven't previously walked the walk on this front.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostI would posit that the impact of gambling may well be very different in the US and UK.
There is a long tradition in the UK that brings with it a certain conservatism (and male chauvinism) that isn't anywhere near as entrenched over here.
Just as attendance trends have diverged to a certain extent in North America and the Continent
It’s not my thing, but my understanding is gambling here will mostly be controlled by big companies. As such, they’re always looking for the next frontier, and women’s sports and sports outside the US would fit that description.
On the other hand, maybe the bookies can make better margins off of the established sports like the NFL because it attracts more “dumb money.” Women’s soccer might only attract bets from people who actually follow it closely, and that can’t be as attractive to bookies. But that’s also largely true for men’s soccer.
Comment
-
Another bit about gambling here.
At least initially, many states will restrict sports gambling to casinos (as Nevada does).
Women represent more than 40 percent of the US casino audience, and that percentage is rising steadily, Sports books will go out of their way to attract that audience.
Comment
Comment