I had one of those daft conversations with friends last night ahead of this weekend's sport, where England and Wales both go into football matches with quite high hopes of success, and Rugby internationals down under with much less optimism.
Someone remarked that in New Zealand, every kid grows up wanting to play rugby, not football (probably a broader generalisation than it used to be, seeing as the football team are doing quite well now) and we wondered whether, if rugby was predominantly the big sort in the UK and football a minority pursuit like hockey, would any of the people who've ended up as footballers have done a job on a rugby pitch instead?
The ones that combine pace with a bit of beef - or could do - are the obvious candidates for centres. Out-and-out speed merchants (Raheem Sterling?) might have been wingers? And then you've got the big unit centre-halves (Neil Ruddock always springs to mind), who might well have become decent second rows or flankers.
Any thoughts? Or do you think the physical attributes of a footballer so distinct from that of a rugby player that they are separate breeds altogether?
Someone remarked that in New Zealand, every kid grows up wanting to play rugby, not football (probably a broader generalisation than it used to be, seeing as the football team are doing quite well now) and we wondered whether, if rugby was predominantly the big sort in the UK and football a minority pursuit like hockey, would any of the people who've ended up as footballers have done a job on a rugby pitch instead?
The ones that combine pace with a bit of beef - or could do - are the obvious candidates for centres. Out-and-out speed merchants (Raheem Sterling?) might have been wingers? And then you've got the big unit centre-halves (Neil Ruddock always springs to mind), who might well have become decent second rows or flankers.
Any thoughts? Or do you think the physical attributes of a footballer so distinct from that of a rugby player that they are separate breeds altogether?
Comment