With Sociedad B having just secured promotion to the Spanish second tier, and Bilbao B potentially joining them tomorrow, it seems curious that there is no apparent cultural backlash against reserve teams in Spain, even though the pyramid system there is quite extensive and long-standing. By contrast, despite similarly lengthy participation by German second strings in its pyramid, there was considerable uproar at their admission to the third tier, and French reserves have never fared particularly well there, though the national chain of tiers has traditionally been significantly weaker (though less regionalised in the last decade or so). Of course England has remained immune until now, but the suspicion remains that the EFL Trophy experiment is a precursor to eventual insertion in the National League structures.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reserving judgement
Collapse
X
-
The English pyramid isn't immune, actually. But it's not the reserve teams of big professional clubs, which means the reserve sides that compete in the pyramid do so at rather low levels - step 7 and similar. For example, the last time the Cambridgeshire County Football League Premier Division (level 11 on the English pyramid or step 7 of non-league) actually played a season, it included Ely City Reserves.
At that level its not much relevant whether a team is a first XI or not - all that matters is 11 players vs 11 players, all of whom want a game of Football.
-
Originally posted by Discordant Resonance View PostWith Sociedad B having just secured promotion to the Spanish second tier, and Bilbao B potentially joining them tomorrow, it seems curious that there is no apparent cultural backlash against reserve teams in Spain, even though the pyramid system there is quite extensive and long-standing
Comment
-
You have now got me going down a rabbit hole of which reserve team is highest up the pyramid. I've found some at step 6, also in East Anglia - four of the sides due to play in Division 1N of the Eastern Counties League in the latest aborted season were the back-ups of AFC Sudbury, Kings Lynn Town, Leiston and Needham Market.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sporting View Post
People here have never never been concerned.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sporting View Post
People here have never never been concerned.
But if a country doesn't run standalone reserve leagues, as Spain and many others don't, then there is basically no other option but having an open system where reserve (and 3rd, 4th, 5th XIs if these exist) teams are mixed in with smaller club's 1st XIs.
I suspect that is also effectively the situation in East Anglia, leading to reserve teams being in the main pyramid - there just isn't sufficient numbers of sides at close enough playing levels to each other for a purely reserve league to be viable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Janik View PostI kind of assumed that the MLS had a similar farm system to other North American major leagues. Does it not? Those are effectively reserve leagues on the 'walks like a duck, quacks like a duck' test.
Comment
-
No, MLS does not currently have a reserve league (some reserve teams play in the USL).
Though it did have one early this century and there is some talk of bringing one back.
As to other major North American leagues, gridiron has never had one and the NBA has only had one since 2001 (with multiple changes in format etc during that period).
Comment
-
Hahaha. Were Fort Lauderdale strikers any good? They figure disproportionately large in my awareness of NASL because they're a pit stop in all the George Best documentaries. (It's basically NY cosmos, Fort Lauderdale Strikers and Vancouver Whitecaps)Last edited by The Awesome Berbaslug!!!; 23-05-2021, 09:59.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ursus arctos View PostI saw Best score what is often called the best goal in NASL history against them after he had joined San Jose Earthquakes.
Is it just the camera angle, or is the 18 yard box unusually wide, or is the pitch just unusually narrow?
Comment
-
Not only are they playing on an American football field, but they are playing on one with lateral stands fronted by permanent concrete balustrades, so there was literally no room for maneuver.
I am pretty sure it was the narrowest field in the league and had a demonstrable impact on how the game was played.
It was genuinely otherworldly to see him do that live, though my lasting sense was that much of the crowd didn't realize how special it was.
Comment
-
I'm working from memory here from when I knew better about these things, but I recall when I was young and used to read the Laws of the Game, the minimum size of a football pitch was 100yds x 50 yds but that for competitive matches the dimensions had to be larger than that. I guess that as the NASL were sometimes 'innovative' with interpretation of the rules, they were able to sanction such a narrow pitch. Again from memory, I think (in the 70s at least) Arsenal had the narrowest pitch in the Football League at around 70 yards - quite a difference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Capybara View PostI'm working from memory here from when I knew better about these things, but I recall when I was young and used to read the Laws of the Game, the minimum size of a football pitch was 100yds x 50 yds but that for competitive matches the dimensions had to be larger than that. I guess that as the NASL were sometimes 'innovative' with interpretation of the rules, they were able to sanction such a narrow pitch. Again from memory, I think (in the 70s at least) Arsenal had the narrowest pitch in the Football League at around 70 yards - quite a difference.
I never saw dimensions quoted for Scottish pitches, but remember my first visit to Hearts and thinking Tynecastle looked smaller than any other pitch I'd seen pro-football played on.
Comment
Comment