Mention of Chris Waddle in another thread inspired this topic. Waddle fits simply by applying this logic: think of the basic job requirements of commentary or punditry and then assess your candidate against those requirements. The first that spring to mind would be:
1. Clarity
2. Noticing something you wouldn't have noticed yourself
3. Tactical insight
4. Insights into player psychology, being a former player himself.
5. Communicating enjoyment of being at the game (if it's a good one) or at least a desire to be at the game
1. Clarity
2. Noticing something you wouldn't have noticed yourself
3. Tactical insight
4. Insights into player psychology, being a former player himself.
5. Communicating enjoyment of being at the game (if it's a good one) or at least a desire to be at the game
Comment