Originally posted by Patrick Thistle
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Most people in favour of No Deal - The FA Cup 2019-20 thread
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Ray de Galles; 01-08-2020, 17:59.
-
Originally posted by Ray de Galles View Post
Only if there is a genuine attempt to play the ball. I didn't think there was anything like one in this case but the referee was apparently heard saying that he/VAR did to Arteta at half time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray de Galles View Post
Only if there is a genuine attempt to play the ball. I didn't think there was anything like one in this case but the referee was apparently heard saying that he/VAR did to Arteta at half time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post
That's another one of those vague things where you have to be able to mind-read the person's intent. I can see why refs wouldn't want to issue a red card unless it was utterly blatant. So generally they follow the yellowcardandpenalty combo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post
That's another one of those vague things where you have to be able to mind-read the person's intent. I can see why refs wouldn't want to issue a red card unless it was utterly blatant. So generally they follow the yellowcardandpenalty combo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by statto99 View Post
I can't accept it's vague when the player makes literally no attempt whatsoever at any point throughout a series of foul actions to move his foot or head towards the ball in a manner intended to strike it. To suggest he did is utterly refusing to see what is in front of the eyes.
The Kovotic red card makes up for it anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post
I wasn't saying the foul was vague, more the wording of the rule (if it's phrased as Ray said). It looked like a tussle that turned into a foul to me.
The Kovotic red card makes up for it anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by statto99 View Post
Apologies, then. I would agree that the wording of he rule appears to be unhelpful and also that refs are rather too inclined (IMHO) to look for a reason not to give the red.
I have some sympathy with the ref. There's the double jeopardy rule. There's the knowing that VAR could over-rule you. There's the ability to determine genuineness and intent without being endowed with psychic powers. Given all that - and it being a FA Cup final - the yellow is the sensible option.
Edit: and karma caught up with Cesar within ten minutes anyway
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post
If it had been a straight red if would have been reviewed by VAR and then, well, you may as well spin a wheel and see what the fuck the needle lands on. They would probably have adjudged it to have occurred outside the area and that the Arsenal player started it.
I have some sympathy with the ref. There's the double jeopardy rule. There's the knowing that VAR could over-rule you. There's the ability to determine genuineness and intent without being endowed with psychic powers. Given all that - and it being a FA Cup final - the yellow is the sensible option.
- the incident *was* checked by VAR
- it was absolutely obvious there was no attempt to play the ball from Azpilicueta, there was no need to judge intent
- the rules don't change because it's a Cup Final!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray de Galles View Post
You are tying yourself in knots here and much of the above is incorrect :
- the incident *was* checked by VAR
- it was absolutely obvious there was no attempt to play the ball from Azpilicueta, there was no need to judge intent
- the rules don't change because it's a Cup Final!
Comment
Comment