Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Most people in favour of No Deal - The FA Cup 2019-20 thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post

    Double jeopardy rule. You don't get sent off if you concede a penalty any more.
    Only if there is a genuine attempt to play the ball. I didn't think there was anything like one in this case but the referee was apparently heard saying that he/VAR did to Arteta at half time.
    Last edited by Ray de Galles; 01-08-2020, 17:59.

    Comment


      We can call that one against the run of play, fair to say!

      Comment


        Lovely finish

        Comment


          That's a very, very tidy finish.

          Comment


            Lovely goal. Aubameyang danced that one in.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Ray de Galles View Post

              Only if there is a genuine attempt to play the ball. I didn't think there was anything like one in this case but the referee was apparently heard saying that he/VAR did to Arteta at half time.
              If this were not true, as many Arsenal fans have apparently pointed out, Luiz wouldn't have been sent off recently v Man City..

              Comment


                Great goal and the first shot on target from either side since Aubameyang's penalty forty minutes earlier. It had been a dreadful game since around the half hour mark.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Ray de Galles View Post

                  Only if there is a genuine attempt to play the ball. I didn't think there was anything like one in this case but the referee was apparently heard saying that he/VAR did to Arteta at half time.
                  That's another one of those vague things where you have to be able to mind-read the person's intent. I can see why refs wouldn't want to issue a red card unless it was utterly blatant. So generally they follow the yellowcardandpenalty combo.

                  Comment


                    Not sure that was much of a second yellow card there

                    Comment


                      Kovacic off after a decidedly soft second yellow.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post

                        That's another one of those vague things where you have to be able to mind-read the person's intent. I can see why refs wouldn't want to issue a red card unless it was utterly blatant. So generally they follow the yellowcardandpenalty combo.
                        I agree it *can* be vague but it seemed pretty clear cut in this instance, given Azpilicueta ignored the ball and pulled the man down.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post

                          That's another one of those vague things where you have to be able to mind-read the person's intent. I can see why refs wouldn't want to issue a red card unless it was utterly blatant. So generally they follow the yellowcardandpenalty combo.
                          I can't accept it's vague when the player makes literally no attempt whatsoever at any point throughout a series of foul actions to move his foot or head towards the ball in a manner intended to strike it. To suggest he did is utterly refusing to see what is in front of the eyes.

                          Comment


                            Just tuned in to see Aubameyang's nice goal and the joke yellow/red.

                            Also whatever Arsenal's numbering font is about.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post
                              Not sure that was much of a second yellow card there
                              Now this I would agree with you on. I hope he wasn't trying to make up for the penalty incident.

                              Comment


                                So we reach the FA Cup final and suddenly VAR isn’t required at all? Okay...

                                Comment


                                  Originally posted by statto99 View Post

                                  I can't accept it's vague when the player makes literally no attempt whatsoever at any point throughout a series of foul actions to move his foot or head towards the ball in a manner intended to strike it. To suggest he did is utterly refusing to see what is in front of the eyes.
                                  I wasn't saying the foul was vague, more the wording of the rule (if it's phrased as Ray said). It looked like a tussle that turned into a foul to me.

                                  The Kovotic red card makes up for it anyway.

                                  Comment


                                    Originally posted by statto99 View Post

                                    Now this I would agree with you on. I hope he wasn't trying to make up for the penalty incident.
                                    Ha! We cross posted.

                                    I don't think he was making up for it.

                                    Comment


                                      Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post

                                      I wasn't saying the foul was vague, more the wording of the rule (if it's phrased as Ray said). It looked like a tussle that turned into a foul to me.

                                      The Kovotic red card makes up for it anyway.
                                      Apologies, then. I would agree that the wording of he rule appears to be unhelpful and also that refs are rather too inclined (IMHO) to look for a reason not to give the red.

                                      Comment


                                        Originally posted by statto99 View Post

                                        Apologies, then. I would agree that the wording of he rule appears to be unhelpful and also that refs are rather too inclined (IMHO) to look for a reason not to give the red.
                                        If it had been a straight red if would have been reviewed by VAR and then, well, you may as well spin a wheel and see what the fuck the needle lands on. They would probably have adjudged it to have occurred outside the area and that the Arsenal player started it.

                                        I have some sympathy with the ref. There's the double jeopardy rule. There's the knowing that VAR could over-rule you. There's the ability to determine genuineness and intent without being endowed with psychic powers. Given all that - and it being a FA Cup final - the yellow is the sensible option.

                                        Edit: and karma caught up with Cesar within ten minutes anyway

                                        Comment


                                          Scant sympathy here, I'm afraid. It's clear Azpilicueta never makes any even remote attempt to play the ball.

                                          Comment


                                            Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post

                                            If it had been a straight red if would have been reviewed by VAR and then, well, you may as well spin a wheel and see what the fuck the needle lands on. They would probably have adjudged it to have occurred outside the area and that the Arsenal player started it.

                                            I have some sympathy with the ref. There's the double jeopardy rule. There's the knowing that VAR could over-rule you. There's the ability to determine genuineness and intent without being endowed with psychic powers. Given all that - and it being a FA Cup final - the yellow is the sensible option.
                                            You are tying yourself in knots here and much of the above is incorrect :

                                            - the incident *was* checked by VAR

                                            - it was absolutely obvious there was no attempt to play the ball from Azpilicueta, there was no need to judge intent

                                            - the rules don't change because it's a Cup Final!




                                            Comment


                                              I think we can say, though, that the yellow/red thing now seems rather insignificant...

                                              Comment


                                                Another injury for Chelsea. At this rate Lampard might have to pick himself for Bayern away on Friday.

                                                Comment


                                                  Fucking Arsenal.

                                                  Comment


                                                    Originally posted by Ray de Galles View Post

                                                    You are tying yourself in knots here and much of the above is incorrect :

                                                    - the incident *was* checked by VAR

                                                    - it was absolutely obvious there was no attempt to play the ball from Azpilicueta, there was no need to judge intent

                                                    - the rules don't change because it's a Cup Final!



                                                    Cheers Ray, so VAR reviewed it and didn't overrule the yellow. Well that clears that up.

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...
                                                    X