Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will having a VARiety of threads work? - televised football 10-12 Aug 2019

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cesar Rodriguez
    replied
    Re. the Man U penalty thing obviously its a non issue if he scores but what doesnt make sense is how Pogba is the designated penalty taker in the first place.

    Rashford takes a much better penalty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Originally posted by The Awesome Berbaslug!!! View Post
    How far is george mc Eachran from the first team?
    Quite some way, I think. He's made the bench once or twice but I don't see him getting much of a chance until he's been out on loan for a couple of years.

    Of all the Chelsea youth team players I've seen in the last 10 years, the ones who stood out were Mount and Hudson-Odoi with Swift, now at Reading, not far behind. Even a football duffer like me could see their quality. McEachran hasn't really caught my eye but we'll see.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Awesome Berbaslug!!!
    replied
    How far is george mc Eachran from the first team?

    Wolves are a right bunch of bastards to play against. They're extremely disciplined, and very difficult to pry open. Man utd managed a couple of times, but not very often. Jesse lingard needed to do a lot better with that chance and obviously Pogba should have taken a better penalty. But Those two goals were beautiful in two very different ways.

    They seem to have had some kind of melt down because man utd leave it up to rashford and pogba to decide between them who takes penalties. last week rashford won the penalty and pogba let him take it. This week Pogba pulled the penalty out of his arse with a brilliant piece of play. So He was going to take the penalty. The thing is, that man utd not having a set penalty taker had the square root of fuck all to do with pogba missing, because paul pogba was the designated penalty taker last season and took 10 in the league, scored seven and missed three. The first time I ever saw paul pogba play for any extended length of time, he got sent off taking a penalty. He is well able to miss a penalty.

    This is one of these things that annoy me. Had Paul pogba scored that penalty it would have been Paul pogba, who scored seven penalties last season with no reference to the three he missed. But he missed so they talk about the three he missed as though paul pogba taking a penalty was on a par with Phil Jones muscling his way in on the action. Both of these are wrong. But the thing that is weirdest about the whole thing, is that the problem seems to arise because pogba missed the penalty. If Man utd had a set penalty taker, it would still have been pogba. and it would be reasonable to expect a 30% chance of him not scoring based on last season.

    The whole thing is incredibly stupid.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cesar Rodriguez
    replied
    Originally posted by Nocturnal Submission View Post


    It was a slightly odd game. Chelsea came flying out of the blocks, were all over Leicester in the first 20-25 minutes, paused for a bit of a breather and were on the back foot thereafter. But Leicester were very good and their athleticism astonishing. I can't remember seeing a side press for so long and so hard against us. Right to the end of the game.

    As for the substitutions, you might be right. Leicester's defensive line was very high so perhaps Lampard thought that Tammy would best exploit it. But keeping Pedro on when he had run himself into the ground, and picked up a knock, was odd.

    I thought we needed more muscle in midfield. We were getting knocked off of the ball too much. Loftus-Cheek's return will help in that regard. And Azpilicueta isn't looking anything like the player he was. I don't think that they rate Zappacosta but they might look at James.
    Azpi looks very ropy nowadays but I wonder how droppable is he when he is club captain?
    Tbh I'm not a big fan of a fullback being captain in the first place. Common sense and tradition dictates that it has to be a midfielder or centre half - my choice would be Kante.

    Agreed, Leicester were more physical and more aggressive in midfield, bullied Chelsea at times. Thats the reason I have a problem with the subs. Clearly we were fighting a losing battle in midfield but 2 of the 3 subs were players who were not going to help us gain control of the midfield or indeed of the game - Barkley or Kovacic for Pulisic would have been my substitution on the 60th minute.
    Last edited by Cesar Rodriguez; 19-08-2019, 15:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Originally posted by Cesar Rodriguez View Post
    1-1 draw at home to Leicester and the Foxes far and away the better side in the second half. I suppose that is to be expected to some degree given the 120 minutes on Weds.

    FWIW I think Lampard got his subs wrong today, bringing Abraham on at the 60th minute when Leicester were in the ascendancy, would have been better to have left Giroud on and have brought on someone to shore up the midfield. So far this season Chelsea look vulnerable on the counter attack every time they cough up possession.

    It was a slightly odd game. Chelsea came flying out of the blocks, were all over Leicester in the first 20-25 minutes, paused for a bit of a breather and were on the back foot thereafter. But Leicester were very good and their athleticism astonishing. I can't remember seeing a side press for so long and so hard against us. Right to the end of the game.

    As for the substitutions, you might be right. Leicester's defensive line was very high so perhaps Lampard thought that Tammy would best exploit it. But keeping Pedro on when he had run himself into the ground, and picked up a knock, was odd.

    I thought we needed more muscle in midfield. We were getting knocked off of the ball too much. Loftus-Cheek's return will help in that regard. And Azpilicueta isn't looking anything like the player he was. I don't think that they rate Zappacosta but they might look at James.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonTon
    replied
    I'm sure I was told there would be a new armchair thread each week.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cesar Rodriguez
    replied
    1-1 draw at home to Leicester and the Foxes far and away the better side in the second half. I suppose that is to be expected to some degree given the 120 minutes on Weds.

    FWIW I think Lampard got his subs wrong today, bringing Abraham on at the 60th minute when Leicester were in the ascendancy, would have been better to have left Giroud on and have brought on someone to shore up the midfield. So far this season Chelsea look vulnerable on the counter attack every time they cough up possession.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Thistle
    replied
    Oh God, he's just appealed to "common sense".

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Thistle
    replied
    Fucking hell, Cahill, are you stoned or something? Finish a sentence without pausing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lang Spoon
    replied
    Originally posted by Arturo View Post

    I've never seen anything so far to suggest otherwise. He's a bit of a model professional - never appears to dive, rarely gets booked, doesn't get involved in backchat, and generally seems very humble. Whether that changes over time in the Premier League is another matter, but I get the impression he's a bit amazed and bewildered by it all.

    Which begs the question, where the hell has he been until last summer? But then there's a few Norwich players whose careers have been reignited by the current coaching regime, so he's not alone.
    He was a massive flop at Celtic a few years back.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Thistle
    replied
    Tim Cahill has a very stilted delivery.

    With pauses.



    Long pauses.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Thistle
    replied
    Are we having new TV threads even week hobbes ?

    Anyway, Leicester's pink and black kit has made me think of licorice allsorts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arturo
    replied
    Originally posted by Nocturnal Submission View Post
    Watching MotD. Teemu Pukki seems like a lovely guy.
    I've never seen anything so far to suggest otherwise. He's a bit of a model professional - never appears to dive, rarely gets booked, doesn't get involved in backchat, and generally seems very humble. Whether that changes over time in the Premier League is another matter, but I get the impression he's a bit amazed and bewildered by it all.

    Which begs the question, where the hell has he been until last summer? But then there's a few Norwich players whose careers have been reignited by the current coaching regime, so he's not alone.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobbes
    replied
    Yellow card for NS. Wrong thread, we're having a new one every week now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    And what a gorgeous goal by Douglas Luiz for Villa.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Watching MotD. Teemu Pukki seems like a lovely guy.

    I'm not sure that the lighting on the new set is doing the lads any favours. It's aged Lineker by about 10 years and made Shearer and Murphy, with their hairless pates, look uglier than ever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Haha!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Awesome Berbaslug!!!
    replied
    well I for one can't get enough of Phil Neville.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jah Womble
    replied
    It's exactly that, but it's making for a somewhat claustrophobic viewing experience. I don't see much value in having identical opinions on every channel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ray de Galles
    replied
    Originally posted by Jah Womble View Post
    I appreciate that yer so-called experts turn up on a variety of shows upon various channels, but hosting rival programming seems to me fortuitous in the extreme. (I mean, like Brian Moore would ever have tipped up on MOTD...)
    I've always presumed it's a consequence of making the "talent" freelance rather than centrally contracted to the BBC (in order that their remuneration isn't directly seen as BBC salary - not that that's worked on a PR angle) meaning they can't be forbade from working with ostensible rivals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jah Womble
    replied
    Originally posted by Patrick Thistle View Post
    Loads of pundits appear across a few channels now. Ian Wright is usually on ITV for internationals. Gary Lineker is on BT Sport. Danny Murphy tips up any and everywhere. Pundits that are only on one gig are either a) loyal, b) lucky to have the one gig because they are rubbish, or c) lazy. Or in Alan Shearer's case, all 3.
    I appreciate that yer so-called experts turn up on a variety of shows upon various channels, but hosting rival programming seems to me fortuitous in the extreme. (I mean, like Brian Moore would ever have tipped up on MOTD...)

    Originally posted by Hot Orange View Post
    Her weekends are going to be frantic once Strictly starts.
    Ha.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nocturnal Submission
    replied
    Zouma got a 10-match ban not because that's what the disparate elements of the incident added up to but because the French FA had a policy at the time, and possibly still do, of huge bans in the event of serious injury to an opponent.

    I'd like to make clear that my fondness for Zouma has nothing to do with how cute his little lad is. When my daughter was a Chelsea mascot a few years ago and we were billeted in the players' family lounge, we spent half of our time making sure that Zouma Jnr. didn't hurt himself as he toddled around the place and on the steps down to the pitch-side box, Ms. Zouma favouring the light-touch approach to parenting.
    Last edited by Nocturnal Submission; 12-08-2019, 12:29.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon G
    replied
    I watched the EFL highlights on Quest on Saturday and for the first time in what seems like ever they decide to mention Cheltenham in their little piece after the goals round-up. How good of Stephen Warnock to talk of Michael Duff being a good young English manager the same Michael Duff who was born in Belfast and has 24 Northern Irish caps.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Awesome Berbaslug!!!
    replied
    I've hated mourinho since that game against porto and his celebration. It was weird to see a manager take all the credit for the goal. It turned out that that was only the beginning of his fucking madness. Also he hasn't changed. He's still a toxic shit talking cunt who spent his time rubbishing the club and his players to protect his own reputation, and he shows no sign of stopping now.

    Well at least now he can spend more time with his family now.
    Last edited by The Awesome Berbaslug!!!; 12-08-2019, 10:16.

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Thistle
    replied
    Also I love how The Awesome Berbaslug!!! still vehemently hates, hates, hates Mourinho.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X