Billions is back. At the end of each episode, and at various points during, I really hate myself for watching it. It's almost everything I loathe about men, pounded into your head for 60 minutes straight. Even the women are loathsome men. It's really something.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Current Watching
Collapse
X
-
We're only in Season 2 of Billions. I love it. Everyone is vile, of course, but you're kind of rooting for all of them at the same time. It's not quite as wonderfully vile as Succession but it's on the same playing field.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Amor de Cosmos View PostAnyone else watching Run on HBO? I figured the premise,* intriguing enough, wouldn't sustain an entire series, but it's grown more compelling as it's gone on. Half-hour episodes are just right and I'm not sure how bingeable it would be. It's essentially a two-hander starring Merritt Wever — who seems to be in almost everything these days — and Domhnall Gleason — Bill Weasley all grown up.
* Two people make a lifetime deal in college. If one ever texts the other with "Run" and the other replies with the same word they'll meet in Grand Central station and take the train to LA together. On arrival they'll decide whether to stay together or not. It happens eight years later.
Comment
-
- Mar 2008
- 7573
- Off the purple line
- I'm slutty: Roma (on haitus until I can forgive them for hiring Jose), Liverpool, and Dortmund
- Del Taco
Originally posted by Amor de Cosmos View PostAnyone else watching Run on HBO? I figured the premise,* intriguing enough, wouldn't sustain an entire series, but it's grown more compelling as it's gone on. Half-hour episodes are just right and I'm not sure how bingeable it would be. It's essentially a two-hander starring Merritt Wever — who seems to be in almost everything these days — and Domhnall Gleason — Bill Weasley all grown up.
* Two people make a lifetime deal in college. If one ever texts the other with "Run" and the other replies with the same word they'll meet in Grand Central station and take the train to LA together. On arrival they'll decide whether to stay together or not. It happens eight years later.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray de Galles View Post
I watched the first episode because I generally like the two leads. However, by about twenty minutes in I was finding their characters' company so annoying I gave up. Yours is the second pretty positive take on it I've seen, I may give it another go.Last edited by Walt Flanagans Dog; 13-05-2020, 20:55.
Comment
-
I find it hard to resist a good train story as well. The story steps up a notch or two when Archie Panjabi appears (around e4?). I guess I don't require characters to be likeable, just interesting, and they do grow on you that way here.
Comment
-
I didn't say my problem with them was they they were unlikeable (which is never a factor that bothers me) but that they were annoying.
Adam Sandler's character in 'Uncut Gems' is unlikeable and also downright irritating but he was also fascinatingly watchable, a compelling character. The problem the characters in 'Run' had for me was that they were annoying and boring.Last edited by Ray de Galles; 13-05-2020, 23:40.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Amor de Cosmos View PostAnyone else watching Run on HBO? I figured the premise,* intriguing enough, wouldn't sustain an entire series, but it's grown more compelling as it's gone on. Half-hour episodes are just right and I'm not sure how bingeable it would be. It's essentially a two-hander starring Merritt Wever — who seems to be in almost everything these days — and Domhnall Gleason — Bill Weasley all grown up.
* Two people make a lifetime deal in college. If one ever texts the other with "Run" and the other replies with the same word they'll meet in Grand Central station and take the train to LA together. On arrival they'll decide whether to stay together or not. It happens eight years later.
Comment
-
Enjoying S2 of After Life, but with two qualifications of that:
SEMI SPOILER
* The coarse, crass, sexist therapist is much, much worse than in S1 and whilst I realise it’s part of a plotline re. Tony’s brother-in-law it’s impacting enjoyment of the show as a whole;
* In Ep4 the local revue was hideous, discomfiting and unfunny.
Both of these I think relate to Gervais’ consciousness that a sense of awkwardness has been a major factor in his past success, but he’s overdone it here. And it’s such a shame as there is a warmth and humanity in this show which makes it genuinely likeable.
Comment
-
Gervais doesn't have enough plot to fill out 6 episodes so we get the therapist and revue as, essentially, filler, but cranked up to the point of being an entirely different show, like plonking a porn scene into a romantic comedy.
On Saturday I enjoyed this very beautiful documentary about excavating a film set
https://www.netflix.com/title/809888...entIntent=true
https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...-from-the-deadLast edited by Satchmo Distel; 14-05-2020, 14:33.
Comment
-
- Mar 2008
- 19085
- Revelling In The Hole
- England, Chelsea and Tooting and Mitcham. And Surrey CCC. And Wimbledon Dons Speedway (RIP)
- Nairn's Cheese Oatcake
Originally posted by Nocturnal Submission View PostI've started watching the latest series of The Real Marigold Hotel and will continue to do so, principally to see if Henry Blofeld manages to cop off with Britt Ekland.
It's not looking too good for Blowers. Britt's realised that Duncan Bannatyne is the one with all the money so she's got her claws into him.
Paul Chuckle still has the shits.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Satchmo Distel View PostGervais doesn't have enough plot to fill out 6 episodes so we get the therapist and revue as, essentially, filler, but cranked up to the point of being an entirely different show, like plonking a porn scene into a romantic comedy.
On Saturday I enjoyed this very beautiful documentary about excavating a film set
https://www.netflix.com/title/809888...entIntent=true
https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...-from-the-dead
Comment
Comment