I am four episodes into Wolf Hall (have reached More's execution) so my comparisons can only go to that point but generally I would say:
1) Acting in Wolf Hall is generally better: I think all the main players have been outstanding.
2) Characters in Wolf Hall are darker: Henry is a weak drunk, More is an egomaniac, Ann Boleyn is a monster.
3) Everything in Wolf Hall seems to be from Cromwell's POV, so we see the king as weak and More as a tyrant because that's how Cromwell saw them.
4) However, I think this has the disadvantage of whitewashing Cromwell to a large extent: he seems to have acquired huge wealth and power without displaying greed or behaving like a total bastard.
5) Wolf Hall perhaps assumes too much prior knowledge on the viewers' part. A lot of suffering is occuring offscreen (burning, torture, robbery of assets) and could perhaps be shown more fully, as it was in The Tudors.
1) Acting in Wolf Hall is generally better: I think all the main players have been outstanding.
2) Characters in Wolf Hall are darker: Henry is a weak drunk, More is an egomaniac, Ann Boleyn is a monster.
3) Everything in Wolf Hall seems to be from Cromwell's POV, so we see the king as weak and More as a tyrant because that's how Cromwell saw them.
4) However, I think this has the disadvantage of whitewashing Cromwell to a large extent: he seems to have acquired huge wealth and power without displaying greed or behaving like a total bastard.
5) Wolf Hall perhaps assumes too much prior knowledge on the viewers' part. A lot of suffering is occuring offscreen (burning, torture, robbery of assets) and could perhaps be shown more fully, as it was in The Tudors.
Comment