Elvis Costello - Unfaithful Music & Disappearing I
Because he's concealing the timelines. If a key event happened in 1981 and he skips it, you can see that in a structure where 1981 is clearly demarcated.
By writing in fragments, he can claim that he excluded Cait from a certain chapter because she did not play a big role in that episode, but if he has a chapter on the period when they met and she's absent from that, the omission is clearer.
Moreover, as both my and the other review state, when Costello has to confront an issue (Ray Charles) he still does not fully open up or even admit to the full offence.
He even says he has no recollection of using the words that caused offence, and has to rely on what people tell him he said. Yet he remembers several other drunken episodes as clear as a bell.
Amor de Cosmos wrote: But I don't buy this. If you're going to go non-linear, you still have to answer the key questions and show how they relate to the structure. I don't this this book achieves that. I still think the non-linear is a dodge, and that if he had to put all the facts in chronological order, some pork pies would emerge.
See I don't get this at all. How does one form of biographical structure conceal EC's lies, and another reveal them?
If deception was the conscious intention on his part then it clearly hasn't worked as you've seen through it, and other reviewers still have unanswered questions.
See I don't get this at all. How does one form of biographical structure conceal EC's lies, and another reveal them?
If deception was the conscious intention on his part then it clearly hasn't worked as you've seen through it, and other reviewers still have unanswered questions.
By writing in fragments, he can claim that he excluded Cait from a certain chapter because she did not play a big role in that episode, but if he has a chapter on the period when they met and she's absent from that, the omission is clearer.
Moreover, as both my and the other review state, when Costello has to confront an issue (Ray Charles) he still does not fully open up or even admit to the full offence.
He even says he has no recollection of using the words that caused offence, and has to rely on what people tell him he said. Yet he remembers several other drunken episodes as clear as a bell.
Comment